Opinion

Will Iran kill the nuclear bomb deal?

17 Apr 2015 - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

ran will find it easier to kill the nuclear bomb deal than will the Republicans in Congress. Why? Because the Republicans need some Democratic senators on their side to overide a veto by President Barack Obama of a vote to bury the accord, whereas in Iran all that is needed is the decision of one man, the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khomenei.
Iran is not a dictatorship - voters, parliament and president carry enormous weight but when it comes to the very big decisions it is Khomenei who decides. He has already said there was “no guarantee” of a final deal with the world powers, the US, the EU, Russia and China, who agreed to the deal. President Hassan Rouhani, a liberally minded man, has also said that Iran would not sign up unless sanctions were lifted “on the first day” of implementation.

There is enough evidence around to suggest that Khomenei is unhappy with the Americans. Soon after the accord was publicized after the marathon negotiations in Geneva, he tweeted, “Hours after the talks, the Americans offered a fact sheet (of explanation of the terms of the agreement)- most of it was contrary to what was agreed. They always deceive and breach promises.”
To understand where Khomenei is coming from we have to separate the question whether Iran really has been trying to build a bomb from the tactics after decades of American and EU hostility and misinformation.

Khomenei would make the same noises if the issue and the negotiations were about, for example, the role of the militias it supports- Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza and its support of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria. What the Iranians are negotiating about is not so much the bomb-

to be or not to be- but about their pride and their position in the world and their right to become a thriving economic and political power inured from sanctions or military threats. (Sanctions were imposed before the nuclear issue came to the fore.)
The nuclear programme has been first and foremost about creating leverage so that Iran can regain the sort of respect that the offspring of the Persian Empire once was given. Second, it has been about making sure that Iran was not found short when its oil reserves started to shrink. (Iran also has heavily invested in solar energy.)

"The Americans offered a fact sheet (of explanation of the terms of the agreement)- most of it was contrary to what was agreed. They always deceive and breach promises"

For Iran, negotiations have been a suggestive game of hide and seek, played in front of all-angled, reflecting mirrors. It has not been about actually building a bomb or, as we used to say in Pakistan’s pre-bomb days, of being “a screwdriver away from completing a bomb”.
I don’t actually believe that Iran’s intention is to build a nuclear bomb. It is to frighten the West. It is to forestall what it believes is the Americans attempt at “regime change”.
In February 2013, Khomenei told a visiting delegation, “We do not want to make nuclear weapons. Not because America is upset over this, but because it’s our own belief. We believe that nuclear weapons are a crime against humanity and must not be produced.”
Khomenei has spoken a number of times about how nuclear weapons went against the principles of Islam. Islam is a language of love and brotherhood, not of a nuclear holocaust.

I believe him, not out of naivety, but because I know Iran is a deeply religious society and that the ayatollahs take Islamic teaching earnestly. Children are brought up to take values seriously, to love not hate, and to take care of the poor and widowed.
Iran doesn’t go easily to war. Saddam Hussein inflicted war on Iran for no good reason, other than to demonstrate the muscle of a dictator. Iran had never sought to build up a deterrent against Iraq. (The US and the UK supported Saddam and provided him with weapons.) Akbar Ganji, an Iranian journalist and dissident wrote in Foreign Affairs that Khomenei “is not a crazy, irrational or reckless zealot searching for an opportunity for aggression”.
Khomenei considers science and progress to be “Western civilization’s truth”. He is a great reader of Western novels and considers Victor Hugo’s “Les Miserables” “to be the best novel that has been written in history”.

He is an intellectual who enjoys the company of other intellectuals including secular opposition ones. Unfortunately, he was also attracted as a young man to the writings of the Egyptian, Sayyid Qutb, whose severe Islamic thinking inspired Osama bin Laden. He has since moderated his opinions.
So listen carefully to Khomenei. His belief that sanctions should be immediately lifted once an accord is signed is correct. He has made it clear that if the final negotiations went well and the deal was made Iran could “use the experience” and negotiate over other differences. This would be a major step to clearing up the mess of the Middle East.

Opinion

Will Iran kill the nuclear bomb deal?

"The Americans offered a fact sheet (of explanation of the terms of the agreement)- most of it was contrary to what was agreed. They always deceive and breach promises"

Most Popular Articles

How far does the political-underworld nexus extend in Sri Lanka?

More arrests would lead to do-or-die elections

The narrowing window: Small-state agency in an age of multipolar scenario

Economic growth is not the only measure of human development

Detention Rights: Sri Lanka and the United States

Chemmani still holds our attention

Latest News

Keiko Fujimori declared winner of Peru’s presidential election weeks after vote

Pope urges Europe to do more for migrants while visiting gateway island

Dengue cases rise due to unplanned construction concerns: Deputy Minister

Pakistan Defence Secretary calls on Deputy Minister of Defence

Joint investment powers Sabaragamuwa Medical Faculty development