AI SUMMARY GENERATED ONLY FROM THIS ARTICLE'S TEXT.
Sri Lanka are considering to write formally to the ICC, seeking an explanation for abandoning their fourth ODI against Australia at the Sydney Cricket Ground when the match could have completed after the rain delay.
The outcome not only frustrated the crowd, which was hoping to see an entertaining finish to the rain-curtailed match, but also Sri Lanka skipper Mahela Jayawardene as the conditions might have favoured his side if the play had been resumed. Having seen far worse conditions against New Zealand in Pallekele only three months ago, Jayawardene was of the opinion that the game should have been completed, especially in a ground like the SCG which is known for its drainage system.
Jayawardene said they would write formally to Javagal Srinath, the ICC match referee, seeking an explanation for an inconsistency in rulings from one series to the next. Srinath had given the explanation that the on field umpires - Paul Reiffel and Marais Erasmus - felt conditions were "unfair" for the play to resume. Meanwhile, in Sri Lanka the match referee, Andy Pycroft, had said play would only be stopped if he found it "unsafe" for the players.
"We played New Zealand three months ago and the interpretation we got in that series was quite different to what we got today," Jayawardene said after the match.
"We played in Pallekele with a lot of rain and during the World Cup as well. I think we need to find a bit more consistency, so that's something we'll probably write and put across to them [the ICC] and see how we can go about it. At the SCG, I would assume that a ground of this magnitude you should be able to get a game in. Maybe they should do what we do back home and cover the entire ground."
Australia captain Michael Clarke also expressed his surprise, saying he had seen a lot more games at the SCG getting completed despite far worse conditions. "I think this ground is known for its drainage," Clarke said. "I've played a number of games here where it's held a lot more water than that and we've managed to get back on and play games of cricket. I think the hardest thing was the water didn't really sink in, it sat on top, there was no sun around and no wind." (Cricket Next)
Comments - 31
Comments - SL mull writing to ICC over SCG ODI abandonment
jude Monday, 21 January 2013 04:19 AM
Micael Clark pretending that he wanted to continue the match. Clark whom you're trying to BS???...Ha.. Ha..Joker Clark you completely forgot what happened to Aussies in ODI 2 & 3. Hey, Bad decision from umpires are part & parcel of the game>???!!!
213
Fazal - Sydney Tuesday, 22 January 2013 02:09 AM
It was Mahela Jayawardena who insisted the umpires several times that play be stopped due to the thin drizzle while Michael Clarke was furious and wanted to continue play. Mahela was banking on the weather gods and the D/L for a Sri Lanka victory which eventually backfired for play to be abandoned as a draw.His intentions were quite obvious. Had he left it to the umpires to make the decision initially about the weather then it could have been different and Sri Lanka would have had a target of about 20 overs to chase 130 runs with already 3 overs bowled. If the surface was too wet it wouldn't have been that easy.
00
roshini Monday, 21 January 2013 08:36 AM
never known Aussies (cricket) to be fair.
16
chandrakumar Monday, 21 January 2013 07:45 AM
Oh, silly kangaroos did it again. They really scared to lose .Umpires seem to have got the wrong vision about the ground conditions.
15
Krishan Monday, 21 January 2013 07:36 AM
D/L target is 126 in 20 overs.. check their website..SL should of won..
12
Ami Monday, 21 January 2013 07:30 AM
Yeah right ... Sour Aussie Grapes :-(
210
modaya Monday, 21 January 2013 06:31 AM
Things happen this way when poor & small countries fight giants. They dictate terms and never want to get defeated.
111
ICCStats Monday, 21 January 2013 06:30 AM
when it comes to cricket comparatively yes - you will have to admit that.
215
Imran Hussein Monday, 21 January 2013 06:18 AM
You are wrong Ken. that was a very smart. strategic move suggested by Charith. There was absolutely no cheating.
114
Ahmed Monday, 21 January 2013 06:16 AM
Not 100..if it was no loss or even 1 wicket..would have been about 75..
15
ravishan Monday, 21 January 2013 05:59 AM
Umpires have called off the match to cover up for their umpiring mistakes against the Aussies.
27
Thomson Anthony Monday, 21 January 2013 05:54 AM
Oh Sissies!
19
chaminda Monday, 21 January 2013 04:49 AM
D/L srilanka might target 100runs for 20 overs.this match surely our.
111
John Monday, 21 January 2013 04:46 AM
Yes of course we in SL are always sqeaky clean & fair!
816
saman Monday, 21 January 2013 04:35 AM
It drizzled only for an hour. The pitch was dry with little bit of sweating. Yes the out field was bit wet. I have seen on many occasions, players return after a rain delay even in test matches. Micky Arthur the Australian coach was ecstatic when the decision was announced. Very bad sportsmanship. Match referee and the umpires are to take the blame. Our boys should know, they can run but they can't hide. Bring on Hobart!
213
Lobo Sunday, 20 January 2013 04:08 PM
Spoil-sport Aussies who hate to lose will use whatever means so they can cling to victory.
22109
samanmali Monday, 21 January 2013 04:06 AM
When we played the world cup final in West indies did the kangaroos sympathies with the Lankans????
114
ICCStats Monday, 21 January 2013 04:01 AM
well that's normal isnt it? When Sri lanka are not playing fair those at the receiving end will cry - both factions will never cry together but you already knew that didn't you?
119
roshan Monday, 21 January 2013 03:50 AM
what mahela did wasnt cheating.it was a brilliant move done within the laws of the game.
529
Ramesh Monday, 21 January 2013 03:37 AM
@ Paul yes the Age does but did you read the Australian which say that the boys were looking to level and walk towards a win in the 5th game.@ Ken do find more details before to speak have you forgotten the golf ball and Gilly story?
46
jumbo Monday, 21 January 2013 03:28 AM
Indian match ref what do u expect.
226
lumbini Monday, 21 January 2013 03:21 AM
If this match was not abandoned, the conditions might have favoured Australians taking into account of the SCG ground situation in the night.
162
Maya Monday, 21 January 2013 02:47 AM
Sure case of match fixing by the SCG authorities.
417
KEN Monday, 21 January 2013 02:44 AM
the head umpire south african erasmus called it off..rubbish ozzies full of tricks..how about mahela switching captains at the T20 to avoid being banned..thats cheating
3410
Raja Monday, 21 January 2013 02:32 AM
The match report of Australia has more value than that of Sri Lanka, for those responsible for abandoning the Match. Sri Lanka, Z’bwe & B’desh are always at the receiving end under these kind of situations.
38
Academic Monday, 21 January 2013 02:33 AM
I'm fuming over this. The wicket, once the covers were off was dry as a bone, there was a little bit of moisture on the off-field. Would have been a joy to play on. And Lanka were on a good bet for a win in this match. Overall, the entire decision making processes during the match require review, Just not good enough.
315
Ravin Monday, 21 January 2013 01:49 AM
Aussies are always full of dirty tricks. It's in their blood. Players, umpires.. u name it
1038
Bagalawathie Monday, 21 January 2013 01:44 AM
Yeah you are right. If the game continued, the ugly Aussie would have come out from them and would have started sledging like hell.
1821
paul Monday, 21 January 2013 01:19 AM
Unfair comment. A quick look at Australian newspapers today will show that Australians were also not happy with the umpires' decision.
2533
Kiwi Monday, 21 January 2013 12:56 AM
When Sri Lanka is at the receiving end of injustice there is a big hue and cry but when Sri Lanka itself does injustice in many things, it's alright!!!!
4815
222
Add comment
Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.