AI SUMMARY GENERATED ONLY FROM THIS ARTICLE'S TEXT.
Despite the parliament green light for the gazette endorsing a pictorial warning covering 80% of the cigarette packet, the Appeal Court delivering its judgement today informed Health Ministry only 50-60% could be given for the warning.
The Court also directed the petitioner Ceylon Tobacco Company to use only 40% of the surface area for its trade marks.
The Bench comprising Justices Anil Gooneratne and Malinie Gunaratne made this order sequent to a writ application filed by the Ceylon Tobacco Company (CTC) challenging the Tobacco Products (Labelling and Packaging) Regulation No. 01 of 2012 of the Minister of Health in the Gazette Extraordinary No 1770/15 dated August 8, 2012 that pictorial warnings cover 80% of the outside of a cigarette packet.
The Court observed that the remaining 20% would not be reasonably sufficient to exhibit the company trademark if 80% of the cigarette packet was used for pictorial warnings.
It observed that petitioners should be given a reasonable opportunity to exercise the rights attached to their registered trademarks to reach the consumers and promote the commercialisation of their goods. The law does not prohibit the sale of tobacco. The Court observed that the trademark owner could not reach the consumers if the trademark was hidden within the health warning.
It observed that a balance needs to be maintained, having considered the submissions by either party. (Lakmal Sooriyagoda)
The visibly angry and disappointed doctors of the Sri Lanka Medical Association (SLMA), led by the Secretary of its Anti-Tobacco Committee, Doctor Manoj Fernando, were seen expressing their disappointment after the verdict. Deputy Minister of Health Lalith Dissanayake also attended courts proceedings today. (Pix by Pradeep Dilrukshana)
►WATCH
Video by Sanath Desmond
Comments - 42
Comments - Video: Appeal court says no to 80%
Concerned Monday, 12 May 2014 11:46 AM
CHURCHES, TEMPLES, KOVILS AND MOSQUES, THIS IS OVER TO YOU. THIS IS THE TIME YOU ALL MUST ACT. SAVE YOUR PEOPLE FROM THIS DANGER!
00
Concerned Monday, 12 May 2014 09:03 AM
Smoking must be totally abolished for the welfare of the general public. So who is safeguarding the rights of the murders? Isn't smoking indirect murder? So the verdict is in favour of murder. What else can we say about it?
00
Paackeer Monday, 12 May 2014 09:04 AM
This is not the correct strategy to bring down smoking. Doctors have to find some other effective way.
00
Concerned Monday, 12 May 2014 09:07 AM
GO TO SUPREME COURT WITHOUT DELAY PLEASE. LET US LEAVE NO STONE UNTURNED UNTIL YOU GET A VERDICT IN FAVOUR OF THE MASSES, SPECIALLY THE YOUNGER GENERATION.
00
ANTON Monday, 12 May 2014 09:16 AM
I THINK YOU HAVE NOT TAKEN ON TO ACCOUNT THE LARGE NUMBER OF ILLEGAL CIGARETTE CONTAINERS WHICH ARE NOT ADDED UP TO THE STATISTICS.
01
Nihal Amarasekera Monday, 12 May 2014 09:26 AM
No, for 80% BUT Yes, for up to 60%, am I correct? So what big fuss, go for the Max and hope for the best.
00
Apsara Monday, 12 May 2014 09:44 AM
All religous leaders should take the challenge to bring down the usage of cigarettes. Educate the masses via intellectually. When the masses obliged to self discipline, then no need to worry about these adds. All tobacco companies will closed down.
00
bmm Monday, 12 May 2014 09:47 AM
FULLY AGREED
00
bmm Monday, 12 May 2014 09:48 AM
FULLY AGREED
00
bmm Monday, 12 May 2014 09:49 AM
This is the truth
00
Ralph Kern Monday, 12 May 2014 10:08 AM
"Why only 50%?" The best would be to display the related Cabinet Minister's photo on the packet.and let fill his pocket. .
10
X Monday, 12 May 2014 09:01 AM
may be the bench of judges delivered the verdict, are the hard-smokers!!!!
01
mario Monday, 12 May 2014 02:33 PM
Advertissing, the rite to chose .afterall CTC is here not to bake bread,
00
Perumal Tuesday, 13 May 2014 03:42 AM
[quote name="venu"]It means lot of things... The country goes for Killing company favor.... isn't it???[/quote] The courts stand for the rights of those who want to kill themselves!
00
Kiris Baba Amaray Tuesday, 13 May 2014 04:51 AM
[quote name="ANTON"]MINISTER'S FACE ON THE PACK ? THEN MOST WILL GIVE UP SMOKING.[/quote] [quote name="ANTON"]MINISTER'S FACE ON THE PACK ? THEN MOST WILL GIVE UP SMOKING.[/quote]
Why not Minister Bandula Gunawardene's face as he too is subject for deadly cancer.
00
Kiris Baba Amaray Tuesday, 13 May 2014 04:52 AM
[quote name="X"]may be the bench of judges delivered the verdict, are the hard-smokers!!!![/quote]
Yes ofcourse, how can the chain smokers advice the public not to smoke.
00
Kiris Baba Amaray Tuesday, 13 May 2014 04:55 AM
My3 Pala Sirisena's face in the Cigarette Packs will be a good move as he could win the smoker's votes for his next PM's election propaganda.
00
jude Tuesday, 13 May 2014 05:00 AM
this type of warning is to reduce and cut down smoking!!!!there's a tangible effect when warning marked on Cig. Pkts!!!!
00
ANTON Tuesday, 13 May 2014 05:58 AM
SORRY, THERE ARE HARD SMOKERS AND BOOZERS IN THOSE PLACES ALSO.
00
LobbyistsRunWorld Tuesday, 13 May 2014 10:01 AM
There is some victory for the people. At least 60% from now on.
Let us hope that soon we will be able to win 80%!
00
Chandike Tuesday, 13 May 2014 11:35 AM
Mathata Thitha 50% works . . not 80%
00
srinath.gunaratne Monday, 12 May 2014 07:28 AM
How much
00
venu Monday, 12 May 2014 05:39 AM
It means lot of things... The country goes for Killing company favor.... isn't it???
07
The citizen Monday, 12 May 2014 06:04 AM
Now the next murderous marketing gymic of the Producer of cigarettes will be to market them in loose form without the packet. Why not make the particular picture displayed in a poster at every cigarettes selling outlets just like the rules to show the price list at every trade outlet in the country.
02
wathsala Monday, 12 May 2014 06:36 AM
We now know who is above president - Tobacco
Please to go supreme court and challenge this judgement
08
samantha Monday, 12 May 2014 06:42 AM
so this means....tobacco business is more important than people's health?
06
nadee Monday, 12 May 2014 06:47 AM
Courts above parliament? Since when? Parliament should raise this and ensure parliament supremacy. After parliament said OK for 80% no one can change that as House gets sovereignty directly from people
04
M. S. Monday, 12 May 2014 06:54 AM
why not the minster recommends to indicate the total percentage of TAXES LEVIED per cigarette together with this pictorial warning.
10
Kanthisiri Perera Monday, 12 May 2014 06:56 AM
It is a well known factor if you smoke you might get canceri . If the person ignore the warning then who is responsible! Then better to follow each citizen by a security guard to prevent smoking.
02
T.MALLAWA Monday, 12 May 2014 07:03 AM
COURT ORDERS ON HOW TO WARN CONSUMERS OR RELIGIOUS SERMONS CANNOT STOP BAD HABITS BUT PARENTS, TEACHERS, RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND DOCTORS CAN SPREAD THE MESSAGE ON HARMFUL EFFECTS OF SMOKING AND OTHER ADDICTIONS. PEOPLE SHOULD NOW CONCENTRATE ON THE YOUNG LIVES BEING RUINED BY DRUG MENACE ON WHICH THE LEADERS PAY ONLY LIP SERVICE.
01
LobbyistsRunWorld Monday, 12 May 2014 07:07 AM
So CTC wins again!
People lose!!
00
LobbyistsRunWorld Monday, 12 May 2014 07:18 AM
[quote name="samantha"]so this means....tobacco business is more important than people's health?[/quote]
???? !!!!!!!!!
00
ANTON Monday, 12 May 2014 05:29 AM
MINISTER'S FACE ON THE PACK ? THEN MOST WILL GIVE UP SMOKING.
73
npj Monday, 12 May 2014 07:29 AM
Why all this fuss. can anyone name 10 people whop had ever given up smoking because of a larger warning?
21
ANTON Monday, 12 May 2014 07:38 AM
MOST OF OUR SRILANKANS DON' BUY PACKETS OF CIGARETS SO HOW CAN THEY SEE THIS WARNING.
03
jaya Monday, 12 May 2014 07:46 AM
REDUCTION OF TOBACCO CONSUMPTION WILL MAKE THE WAY OR OTHER DRUGS TO COME IN NOW
00
nadee Monday, 12 May 2014 07:56 AM
This is shocking
01
wathsala Monday, 12 May 2014 08:12 AM
Don't worry doctor....we would not have got even this 50-60% if not for the hard work of SLMA tobacco committee and ADIC...please carry on good work...don't get disheartened
01
Saman Monday, 12 May 2014 08:24 AM
WRONG! The desire is to prevent their marketing strategy by displaying packs in supermarkets and other places too. And Industry use even free packets by shedding empty packs elsewhere as a promotional strategy. So it's work. THATS WHY CTC DOES"NT WANT IT>>>>>
00
lkboy Monday, 12 May 2014 08:35 AM
Shocking decision!
01
narada Monday, 12 May 2014 08:39 AM
i like to tell , tobacco agents they are doing their distribution on poya days, to achieve sales targets ,society should force to stop sales & distribution on poya days,
10
Rubert Vanderkoon Monday, 12 May 2014 08:50 AM
Yes I can. Is 10 enough, because I can name 100, starting from my brother and my best friend. When I worked at Ceylon Tobacco in Kandy, they had a large factory base there. Now a part of that land is occupied by Ceylon Shipping and the another to Colombo International School. CTC occupies only less than a third. The cigarette use has dropped by about 60% since late 1980s.
01
222
Add comment
Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.