SC sends opinion to President

11 November 2014 03:43 am - 7     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

A A A

The Supreme Court yesterday communicated its opinion to President Mahinda Rajapaksa on the constitutionality of contesting for a third term under the 18th Amendment to the Constitution.


A ten-judge bench comprising Chief Justice Mohan Peiris, Justice K. Sripavan, Justice Chandra Ekanayake, Justice Priyasath Dep, Justice Eva Wansundera, Justice Rohini Marasinghe, Justice Buwaneka Aluwihare, Justice Sisira J de Abrew, Justice Sarath de Abrew and Justice Priyantha Jayawardena had taken up for consideration the written submissions filed by various individuals and parties.


Supreme Court sources said Justice Saleem Marsoof was not present on the bench as he was away on an official overseas tour.


They said the Supreme Court had received more than 35 written submissions by 3.00 p.m. last Friday (7). Among the individuals who filed written submissions were: Prime Minister D.M. Jayaratne, Attorney-At-Law Gomin Dayasiri, Prof. Kshanika Hirimburegama, Dr. Ajith Pathirana, Attorney-At-Law Anoma Gunatilleke, Prof. Sampath Bandara Amaratunga, President’s Counsel Romesh de Silva, President’s Counsel Kuvera de Silva, Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, Dr. N.L.A. Karunaratne, Attorney-At-Law Sunil Watagala, Attorney-At-Law Upul Kumarapperuma, Ravaya Editor Attorney-At-Law K.W. Janaranjana and Attorney-At-Law J.C. Weliamuna.   


President Mahinda Rajapaksa had sought the Supreme Court’s opinion on the constitutionality of contesting for a third term under the 18th Amendment to the Constitution in terms of the Article 129 of the constitution.


The reference sent to the Supreme Court was as follows:


(a) Whether in terms of Article 31 (3A) (a) (1) of the Constitution, as amended by the 18th Amendment, I as the incumbent President, serving my second term of office as President, have any impediment, after the expiration of four years from the date of commencement of my second term of office as President on November 19, 2010, to declare by Proclamation my intention of appealing to People for a mandate to hold office as President by election, for a future term.


(b) Whether in terms of the provisions of the Constitution, as amended by the 18th Amendment, I, as the incumbent President, serving my second term of office as President, and was functioning as such on the date of the 18th Amendment was enacted, have any impediment to be elected for a further term of office”.(Lakmal Sooriyagoda)

 

See Kapruka's top selling online shopping categories such as Toys, Grocery, Flowers, Birthday Cakes, Fruits, Chocolates, Clothing and Electronics. Also see Kapruka's unique online services such as Money Remittence,News, Courier/Delivery, Food Delivery and over 700 top brands. Also get products from Amazon & Ebay via Kapruka Gloabal Shop into Sri Lanka.

 

  Comments - 7

See Kapruka's top selling online shopping categories such as Toys, Grocery, Flowers, Birthday Cakes, Fruits, Chocolates, Clothing and Electronics. Also see Kapruka's unique online services such as Money Remittence,News, Courier/Delivery, Food Delivery and over 700 top brands. Also get products from Amazon & Ebay via Kapruka Gloabal Shop into Sri Lanka.

 

 
  • JJ Tuesday, 11 November 2014 11:30 AM

    Ba Ba Black sheep have you any wool. yes sir yes sir three bags full.

    SB Tuesday, 11 November 2014 11:39 AM

    Delay revealing because it has implications on CBK too.

    sukirichuti Tuesday, 11 November 2014 03:10 PM

    What take such a long time to give the verdict. As Dr. Wickramabahu said, MR must have communicated the verdict as well along with his question.

    bputhra Tuesday, 11 November 2014 10:32 AM

    Lets see under what provision of the Constitution that stamp on the President for two terms can be removed.

    Mithun Tuesday, 11 November 2014 11:04 AM

    Why this much of time to know what is the decision is?

    Freebird Tuesday, 11 November 2014 11:03 AM

    Hope that will be a positive opinion via DM Android App

    tony Tuesday, 11 November 2014 11:26 AM

    MR LEAD THE SC WITH A QUESTION, AND THE SC HAS ONLY ANSWER TO THE QUESTION POSED BY MR. THIS COULD HAVE BEEN ORCHESTRATED TO FACILITATE MR TO SUBMIT HIS QUESTION ACROSS IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE RULING WILL BE HIS FAVOUR. PAST EXPERIENCE HAS THAT MR IS CLEVER TO DO THESE KIND OF TRICKS. HE WILL HAVE TO FACE A FULL TRIAL WHEN PARTIES SUBMIT THEIR OBJECTIONS AFTER HE HANDS OVER HIS NOMINATIONS


Add comment

Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.

Reply To:

Name - Reply Comment




ANYTHING FOR MONEY

Some unregulated online lenders are remotely taking control of phones of thos

Frontline cops charge negligence by high-ups worsened police cluster

The police have done an invaluable service in the frontlines to combat the CO

US Vice President-Elect Kamala Harris’s Key Sri Lankan Tamil Aide

An overwhelming feeling of relief has descended upon the world-not merely th

The virus may be spreading much faster than official data suggest

The daily case reports from the Epidemiology Unit are the only data we have t

See Kapruka's top selling online shopping categories such as Toys, Grocery, Flowers, Birthday Cakes, Fruits, Chocolates, Clothing and Electronics. Also see Kapruka's unique online services such as Money Remittence,News, Courier/Delivery, Food Delivery and over 700 top brands. Also get products from Amazon & Ebay via Kapruka Gloabal Shop into Sri Lanka.