Reply To:
Name - Reply Comment
.jpg)
ur collective prayers have been answered and the Presidential election is over with little violence as feared by many. My own doubts and fears about the state of democracy and the political wisdom of our voting public have been laid to rest. As in Post-WW II Britain, at a time when Winston Churchill as the Prime Minister, was held in great admiration and awe, as a hero whose leadership helped save Britain and Europe from the scourge of Nazism, he was soundly defeated in the general election that followed. While the British public acknowledged with deep gratitude the service and leadership of their war time PM, they opted for another to lead them - to a lasting peace, during which period India and other colonies gained their independence, and the British Empire was dismantled -a task which Churchill had openly declined to participate in. I see similar wisdom demonstrated in SL, where the people have opted for a leadership to usher in a lasting peace in our troubled land. I have confidence that these hopes are well grounded and can be achieved with the support of peace loving men and women of goodwill of all races and faiths, in our multi-cultural and multi-facetted society, who I believe comprise the silent majority.
The other important factor that contributed to the changes seen, was the people’s perception of the growing corruption and misuse of public funds and what can be described as “unjust self enrichment”, which resulted in the growth of the “Casino culture”, eroding the value structure and ethics taught by the four great religions practised in our land. This trend was seen even in India where the Modi government swept into power, as a backlash against rampant corruption observed. The dictum -”Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely” come to mind. Of course the new dispensations in both neighbouring countries, need to deliver on their promise to be truly transparent and accountable in their governance. This is the greatest need.
A right of information act, and other such measures, which will help reinforce the Rule of Law, will be urgent needs
The need for Constitutional change is on the lips of many right thinking people. We have had two new republican constitutions since Independence - in 1972 and in 1978. We now have a hybrid presidential form of Government which has reposed enormous powers in the incumbent President and virtually placed him above the law. Although there were Constituent Assemblies assembled to draft these constitutions, many hold the view that they were the brainchild of dominant personalities of the time, Colvin R. de Silva and the Jayawardene brothers. As far as I am aware there was little consultation with the right thinking public, the professionals, constitutional lawyers and intellectuals, minority political leaders, religious leaders and others so vitally important if this document was to serve the purpose of safeguarding peace, justice and good governance in the land.
At this time when much is being talked about the need for important changes to the Constitution or indeed drafting a new one, it is my view that adequate thought and emphasis needs to be given to the manner in which this objective can be best achieved, with lasting benefit to the Nation. We can learn from the experience of other lands. The experience of South Africa [SA] comes readily to mind.
At a recent seminar to commemorate the life of Nelson Mandela, held at the OPA [of which I am a member of the Forum, as a nominee of the IESL], the SA Ambassador , was the lead speaker, and in response to my question, explained at some length the long process by which the new SA Constitution was formulated and enacted. Every effort had been made to get inputs from all sections of the intelligensia. SA like our land, had gone through a long, bitter and divisive period of virtual civil war and armed conflict. Peace had been restored and a fresh Constitution needed to be adopted, to be the foundation for a lasting peace. That had been achieved in the most participatory manner possible. This is reflected in the drafting of the “Preamble” found on the page of the Constitution document.-[which is a booklet of 181 pages.]
The first two paras of the preamble are quoted below