Reply To:
Name - Reply Comment
The recent incarceration of ex-President Ranil Wickremesinghe over the alleged misuse of public funds to travel to England—reportedly to accompany his wife, Maithree, in receiving an award from Wolverhampton University—raises a larger ethical question: how should public officials distinguish between state and personal expenses?
History provides a timeless example in the life of the righteous Caliph, Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz (Umar II). As recorded in the book ‘Al-Bidāyah wa al-Nihāyah’ (The Beginning and the End) by the historian Ibn Kathir, Umar II scrupulously separated public duty from private matters. When attending to state affairs, he used the government-funded lamp. Yet, the moment a personal or family issue arose, he would extinguish it and light another lamp with oil purchased from his own money, saying: “The gas for the lamp was bought with the government’s funds, while the matter that you wish to discuss with me is a family matter”.
This simple but profound gesture embodies accountability and respect for the public trust. It is a standard to which not only ex-presidents but all officeholders—past, present, and future—must be held. As Wickremesinghe reportedly left the NHSL (National Hospital of Sri Lanka) carrying Boris Johnson’s ‘Unleashed’, one hopes he might also reflect on Ibn Kathir’s ‘The Beginning and the End’. It offers far greater lessons on integrity in public office and reminds us that the line between state resources and personal gain must never be blurred.
Mohamed Zahran
Colombo