Former President and Kurunegala District MP Mahinda Rajapaksa who spoke in Parliament for the first time since his election as an MP said yesterday that some who allege about wrongdoings during his regime remained silent then.
“Some of them were even ministers in my Cabinet," he said.
Mr. Rajapaksa who responded to a statement by his successor Maithripala Sirisena that 12,000 LTTE members were released during the previous regime said they were released after ensuring they would not go back to war again.
But he said suspicions had arisen over this government's action to release former LTTE cadres. He said situation was same with regard to the deproscription of diaspora organizations.
Mr. Rajapaksa said his government had set the stage for reconciliation by developing infrastructure facilities in the North and East and recalled that the LLRC and the Pranagama Commissions were appointed by him.
He said fulfilling the demands made by the Tamil diaspora was not reconciliation and asked the government not to degrade the security forces.
Mr. Rajapaksa asked the government not to bring in laws to enable the setting up of special courts to try security forces personnel. (Yohan Perera)
The full speech made by Mr. Rajapaksa
In 2009, we militarily defeated the LTTE which had been officially named by the US Federal Bureau of investigation as the deadliest terrorist organisation in the world. Though we had defeated the military machine of the LTTE, their political and financial structures based in Western countries remain intact. Therefore, my government maintained constant vigilance to ensure that there was no resurgence of terrorism in Sri Lanka. There were about four attempts of varying severity by separatist terrorists to regroup in the North but due to our vigilance my government was able to nip all those attempts in the bud.
I see now that this vigilance no longer exists. My government rehabilitated and released over 11,000 LTTE cadres and retained in custody only those considered to be dangerous to the community. The present government has been hastily releasing hard core terrorists without regard to the nation’s security due to political pressure from certain interested quarters.
While dangerous LTTE detainees are being released, the Prevention of Terrorism Act is being used to imprison members of the military. The PTA was enacted to deal with terrorism, not to detain members of the armed forces. If any investigation is to be carried out into the conduct of military personnel, the government has a duty to deal with the issue under the laws applicable to the military or under the ordinary law of the country. That is a basic curtsy that we have to extend to members of the armed forces who sacrificed so much for the country. We have to be heedful of the self respect of our armed forces.
Officials of foreign organisations have been permitted unfettered access to Sri Lanka’s military installations such as the Naval base in Trincomalee. This has resulted in an immediate danger posed to members of the intelligence wing of the Navy reminiscent of the situation that arose after the Millennium city betrayal in 2002.
We have to be mindful of the events which occurred on the so called Mahaviru day marked recently. The black flags and the posters on the Jaffna campus openly deified Prabhakaran and called for the establishment of Eelam. The provincial council of the Northern Province ordered that schools be closed and hartals and hunger strikes were organised in the North to bring pressure to bear on the government to release dangerous terrorists. A 17 year old youth jumped in front of a moving train and committed suicide. It is said that a letter was found in his possession demanding that LTTE prisoners be released forthwith. It is not possible to believe that a teenager would have resorted to this behaviour without instigation and elaborate planning by others. We must be mindful of where these incidents are leading the country.
Despite the danger signs that have been manifesting themselves, the government has taken the ill-advised move of removing the proscriptions on eight pro-LTTE organisations and 269 individuals. I have seen on the internet photographs of the Tamil Youth Organisation and the Canadian Tamil Congress both of which were recently de-proscribed, hoisting the Eelam flag and paying public homage to Prabhakaran. These are organisations which my government banned to safeguard Sri Lanka’s security but they have all been irresponsibly de-proscribed by the current administration.
Officials of foreign governments have visited our country and made demarches to Sri Lanka’s leadership about withdrawing the military from the Northern Province. Decisions with regard to the deployment of troops are matters that should solely be within the sovereign jurisdiction of Sri Lanka. I cannot approve of officials of foreign governments declaring that they will remain ‘cautious and vigilant’ with regard to military matters in Sri Lanka.
The root cause of these problems is the ill-conceived foreign policy of the current administration which is based on bending over backwards to please certain foreign governments which are in turn influenced in their policy towards Sri Lanka by various Tamil Diaspora organisations which can deliver votes at elections in those countries.
In October this year, the present government ill-advisedly accepted and co-sponsored a resolution against Sri Lanka which is based on a report which states that there are ‘reasonable grounds to believe’ that Sri Lanka’s armed forces committed grave crimes during the last phase of the war against the LTTE. In terms of this resolution the government has agreed to establish a war crimes court to try Sri Lankan military personnel with the participation of foreign judges, prosecutors and investigators and to allow this mechanism to obtain funding from foreign countries. They have also agreed to reform the domestic law to bring it into line with the laws implemented by international war crimes tribunals. They have also undertaken to remove through an administrative process, members of the military suspected of having committed human rights abuses even if there is insufficient evidence to charge them in a court of law.
When the British prime minister met our President recently, the former made an offer of six million pounds to reform the military. I do not believe that foreign governments should be sponsoring the reform of Sri Lanka’s armed forces nor should any such reform be done due to pressure from overseas.
I have come to learn that the senior military officers who led the various Divisions during the final phase of the war are to be retired without being given the usual service extensions. When these officers retire, they lose the institutional backing and protection provided by the military. Sending these officers on retirement at a time when war crimes investigations are being spoken of is a clear case of deliberately abandoning these officers. It is my view that these officers should be granted service extensions by the government until the danger abates.
The government has also agreed amend the Public Security Ordinance and to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act and replace it with legislation acceptable to the foreign powers. I see this as a reckless dismantling of the country’s core security legislation.
The State owned Rakana Lanka Security Service built up a successful maritime security service in the Indian Ocean Region during my administration. More than twenty private security companies collaborated with Rakna Lanka in this enterprise in various capacities. Sri Lanka earned a considerable amount of foreign exchange through this endeavour and it continued to function under the present government until very recently. But now I find that the government has for political reasons embarked on a course of action aimed at completely destroying this successful maritime security service which functioned with the approval of the relevant UN bodies.
Key individuals who provided political and military leadership to the war effort are now being hauled virtually on a daily basis before various police financial investigation units and commissions of inquiry probing allegations corruption and fraud. I believe this is being done to tarnish the image that these individuals built up in the country by providing leadership to the war effort. I know that the people are following these developments carefully.
I wish to call upon the government to not to place the nation’s security in jeopardy over petty political considerations and due to their antipathy towards me and the government I led. Thank you!
Comments - 12
mnsmart Saturday, 05 December 2015 08:52 AM
Did they remained silent or forced to be silent?
suresh Saturday, 05 December 2015 06:50 PM
appointed LLRC but never implemented any of the recommendations
The Real Minister of Finance Saturday, 05 December 2015 10:09 PM
Sir, maybe now srilankans are understanding their wrong choice in voting MS and RW..
Sammy Saturday, 05 December 2015 11:20 AM
That is because they would have received the white van treatment had they shouted out during your regime, MR.
pady Friday, 04 December 2015 06:16 PM
Well Said Sir .
Sincere Friday, 04 December 2015 06:21 PM
That shows how corrupt your regime was then! Now it comes out from your own mouth!
Boonda Friday, 04 December 2015 06:23 PM
That is the point. Your regime restricted all with white vans.
Dandanaka Friday, 04 December 2015 06:41 PM
It is pathetic to see that a former excellency addressing, honourable speaker!! Does MR needs this?
Eds Friday, 04 December 2015 06:45 PM
Very well said. Straight to the point!
Gratiaen Saturday, 05 December 2015 01:09 PM
How nice if he remains neutral after retirement! I think he cannot understand this. We feel sorry.
Tomsam Friday, 04 December 2015 06:52 PM
Your utterance is wrong; people kept quiet either to enjoy the perks of your plunder or despised an one way ride in white van.
Shan Friday, 04 December 2015 08:16 PM
What is big about MR? He is just a member of the Parliament. He must respect the Speaker.
Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.