08 Sep 2015 - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}
My unambiguous opinion is that Mr. Sampanthan is a gentleman of the old school, one of the finest parliamentarians we have and ranks high among the few such left such as Dinesh Gunawardena. As an individual he is streets ahead of the person named by the pro-MR camp as its choice of Leader of the Opposition (Dinesh or Dullas, Vasu or Vidura would have been far better). Therefore my opinion that it was a blunder to name Mr. Sampanthan as the Leader of the Opposition does not derive from any personal criticism or any doubts whatsoever about his abilities. If I may be clearer still, my critique is not sourced in his ethnicity either -- were he, Neelan Tiruchelvam or Dharmalingam Siddharthan I might even be cheering.
On Aug 17, the people voted for a weak UNFGG Government and a strong UPFA opposition. The fact that this was subsequently manipulated and distorted by the formation of a national government is neither here nor there. The UPFA has 95 seats. Even if one subtracts those SLFP MPs who turned their backs on their popular mandate and voted in favour of a national government, the remainder is numerically the larger part of the SLFP/UPFA group. Most pertinently, they are numerically several times larger than the 16 member TNA. The fact that Prof. Warnapala, as (un-ratified) UPFA General Secretary conveyed to the speaker a decision (not taken by any collective deliberation of the UPFA) to step aside from the post of Opposition Leader, cannot obscure the realities, both arithmetical and socio-political. It is but a mere technicality.
03 Jul 2026 1 hours ago
03 Jul 2026 2 hours ago
03 Jul 2026 2 hours ago
03 Jul 2026 2 hours ago
03 Jul 2026 3 hours ago