24 Jan 2026 - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

This cartoon shows a weary worker at the foot of three dark peaks. The first is labelled “Compulsory Attendance for 25 Days,” the second “Difficult Working Conditions,” and, far beyond both, a tiny money bag marked “Rs. 1750” sits on the final summit. The image turns policy into landscape: to reach a modest reward, the worker must scale multiple hurdles.
The message is straightforward. Attendance targets and tough conditions can make even small incentives feel out of reach, especially for people who already labour long hours. The distance between the effort demanded and the reward offered is the joke — and the criticism.
At the same time, the cartoon leaves space for another view. Tying bonuses to attendance aims to reduce absenteeism and stabilise output; employers might argue it helps planning and pay consistency. But the drawing asks whether the bar is set so high that those meant to benefit struggle to qualify.
The lone climber, bent under a basket and stick, keeps the focus on human cost rather than ideology. The peaks aren’t villains; they’re obstacles. Overall, the cartoon suggests that if incentives are meant to help workers, the path to them should be realistic — otherwise the summit remains symbolic, not attainable.
15 Jun 2026 14 minute ago
15 Jun 2026 17 minute ago
15 Jun 2026 27 minute ago
15 Jun 2026 39 minute ago
15 Jun 2026 1 hours ago