Sun, 23 Nov 2014 16:21
Apps Ad Specs Home Delivery Feedback
Pakistan’s schizophrenia
2012-08-03 00:00:05
3
1093
Pakistan is a country that seems sometimes to be on the verge of collapse- a scenario that frightens the US, Europe, India, Russia, China, the countries of the Middle East and Sri Lanka too. All fear that Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal might fall into the hands of Taliban militants.
 
Pakistan’s political and religious problems are rather like a Russian doll. You open one doll and there is another inside and so it goes on until the smallest doll is revealed six dolls later. Moreover, in Pakistan each doll has its complications and contradictions. Sometimes this makes the country’s policies hard to read.
 
Self-interest is usually the aim of every state. Yet Pakistan seems to be continuously shooting itself in the foot.  Under the hammer of the US President Pervez Musharaff, then the military and political chief of Pakistan agreed to support the Americans in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. Pakistan was pushed to the front line in the battle to destroy Al Qaeda holed up in Afghanistan. Musharaff had few doubts that this was the right thing to do both morally and in the interests of his country. 
 
But where Pakistan and the US and Europe diverged was in Musharaff’s attitude towards the Taliban. He couldn’t see that the US decision to go to war against Afghanistan’s Taliban was likely to be successful or was necessary. Moreover, Pakistan’s principal military interest is in confronting India. To that end most of Pakistan’s military forces are deployed close to the border with India.
 
It was this viewpoint that has led to bad blood between Washington and Islamabad. The Americans have never been able to accept it and have failed to comprehend why Pakistan has nurtured and armed Taliban forces. To them it is a betrayal. To Pakistan it is a long standing national interest. If the Taliban were defeated Afghanistan would turn in India’s direction and Pakistan would be effectively encircled. If Musharaff had not acted the way he did it could well have led to him being deposed by his own military and if today the civilian government ended that policy it would result in a military coup. 
 
Yet one of the great contradictions- indeed one of the big questions in Pakistani politics- is why did pro-Taliban terrorists try to assassinate Musharaff twice in 2003? The ISI lost control of the militant groups it assiduously worked with. The only reason that makes any sense to me is that the Islamist militants feared the negotiations that Musharaff was earnestly carrying out with India- to devise a peace plan that would finally lay to rest the long time conflict over the Indian state of Kashmir. The conflict has led to three wars and over many years a guerrilla insurgency backed by Pakistan military’s intelligence service, the ISI.
 
Musharaff as commander of Pakistan’s military was the only person who could lead the country to bite the bullet on this issue. He made compromises with India that all had considered impossible. The Indians, led by pro-peace Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, reciprocated in the negotiations. A peace deal truly seemed in the offering. But at the last step Singh faltered, stymied by the lack of support from India’s military , intelligence services and, to some degree, the foreign ministry where the idea that India is so big and powerful that it doesn’t need to compromise holds sway. Without them visibly behind him public opinion would not have tolerated Singh’s concessions. Indeed his life could have been threatened by Hindu militants. The US which should have pushed India as hard as it could was amazingly insouciant.

President George W. Bush was disinterested and switched off on the issue. If the US had used its muscle and succeeded and a peace had been signed Pakistan would not be in the mess it is today and the Taliban would not have received the support they have from Pakistan.
 
The US and the rest of the West in 2001 and ever since have never read Pakistan right. To them the machinations of the ISI in supporting the Taliban have always seemed an unfathomable betrayal and one that had to be rectified by heavy political pressure. They have never succeeded. The US, however, did manage to push the military to wage war against the Pakistani Taliban based in the Federal Administered Tribal Areas in the north- many of the fighters had come from Kashmir where they had been frustrated by Musharaff’s Indian diplomacy. It was from this base that the militants have turned to bombing in Pakistani cities. Amazingly the ISI still give succour to the Taliban, convinced they have to until there is a settlement in Afghanistan that meets Pakistan’s interests.
 
Pakistan is a confused and violent place. Its military and government are often schizophrenic. Where this will lead to no one knows. But we should be prepared for the worst.

Foreign affairs columnist for the International Herald Tribune for 20 years and gust columnist for New York Times

Comments - 3
karuna-nidi Friday, 3 August 2012 16:43
What pakistan should do is to attack India and collapse it. Then to support to USA to eradicate Taliban. Simple as that!
Reply .
8
0
INDIAN Saturday, 4 August 2012 18:53
Whole Of Middle East including Pakistan don't have guts to fight with INDIA.....Period
Reply .
0
1
Kanchana Saturday, 4 August 2012 06:12
The pakistani people are the problem not the solution. The majority of pakistani people sympathize with the ideology of terrorists (mujahids). It tells a lot about the character of a pakistani 'man'.
Reply .
0
3




Add comment
Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.
Name :
Name is required
e-mail:
Email is required
Comment :
Comment cannot be empty

POPULAR POSTS