The International Students for Social Equality (ISSE) calls on students to oppose the Sri Lankan government’s plans to introduce a new higher education act this month to pave the way for private universities. The new laws will further erode the access of young people to tertiary education and worsen the conditions facing students in the country’s public universities.
The preparation for the legislation has been accompanied by a vicious crackdown in recent weeks on students opposed to privatisation. In all, 30 students have been arrested across the Peradeniya, Ruhunu, Rajarata and Jayewardenepura universities on a variety of charges under legislation revived by university authorities in April to block political activity on campuses. Another 200 students have been suspended. Last Friday, police detained Udul Premaratna, convenor of the Inter-University Student Federation (IUSF), which organised the protests.
Notwithstanding the ISSE’s implacable opposition to the IUSF’s communal politics, the ISSE demands the immediate release of the arrested students and the dropping of all charges against them. The IUSF, which is linked to the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), is notorious on campuses for thuggery against their political opponents, providing the government with a pretext for repressive measures. The arrests, however, are broadly aimed at intimidating students, stifling political activity and suppressing any opposition to the privatisation moves.
The new legislation, which has not been made public, is to change the 1978 University Act, which makes no provision for private universities. A previous attempt in 1980 to establish a private institution—the North Colombo Medical College—faced opposition from university students and staff, and questions were raised about the validity of its degrees. The college was later brought under the umbrella of Kelaniya University.
Higher Education Minister S.B. Dissanayake has made clear that the new law will open the floodgates for private universities. Addressing the Sri Lanka-Australia-New Zealand Business Council on October 19, he said discussions are already underway with 15 foreign universities to set up private facilities, including Australia’s Monash University and China’s Beijing State University.
Higher Education Secretary Sunil Navaratne told the meeting that his department and the Board of Investment would provide a “one-stop-shop” for international universities. They will not be subject to controls on student fees and will be offered free land and tax concessions.
Attempting to justify the legislation, Dissanayake told the media that the government was seeking the involvement of foreign universities because it would take 10 years to improve the existing 15 state-owned universities. The comment is a tacit admission that the government intends to let public university education languish. The result will be a two-class university system: underfunded, crowded institutions for the majority of students, and private universities for those that can afford to pay.
Government expenditure on education fell from 2.67 percent of GDP in 2006 to 2.08 percent in 2009 as President Mahinda Rajapakse boosted military spending for his communal war against the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). Under pressure from the International Monetary Fund, the government is preparing new spending cuts in this month’s budget.
University students are already facing atrocious conditions, including crowded lecture halls, and a lack of staff, laboratories, adequate libraries and other facilities. At the University of Kelaniya, for instance, the library has 800 spaces for a student population of 8,200. There are not enough hostels, forcing most students into private accommodation. Many students live in poverty on their means-tested allowance of 2,500 rupees ($US22) a month.
Dissanayake’s claim that thousands of students currently unable to enter university will benefit from the private institutions is a lie. The fees will place the private universities out of the reach of the vast majority of young people. The minister is hoping to negotiate free entrance for a percentage of students but even that is uncertain. The government’s overriding aim is to encourage foreign investment by turning Sri Lanka into the “knowledge hub of Asia”.
Well aware of broad opposition among students, the government is preparing to use the police-state measures that were built up during the war against the LTTE. Using the alleged violence of the IUSF in clashes with police, Rajapakse is preparing for the brutal suppression of all student resistance.
On October 26, the president summoned university vice chancellors for a meeting to deal with student opposition to privatisation. “About two thousand politically-motivated students are attempting to upset the education of over 80,000 university students and those unruly students will be dealt with the law prevailing in the country,” he warned.
Higher Education Secretary Navaratne indicated the thrust of Rajapakse’s comments, telling the media: “[T]he decree of the government prevails there [in the universities] like they [the security forces] did in Kilinochchi [the LTTE’s administrative centre] in the past by defeating terrorism.”
Underscoring the threat to use the military against students, Higher Education Minister Dissanayake in an interview with Lakbima newspaper recalled how the Chinese regime responded to mass protests by students and workers in Tiananmen Square in 1989. The government would not hesitate to sack two or three thousand of students to “defend the country’s university system,” he said.
University students cannot defend public education alone but must turn to the working class, which is also confronting serious attacks on jobs, conditions and essential services as the government implements the IMF’s agenda of pro-market restructuring. Above all, this involves a political fight to build an independent movement of workers and youth against the Rajapakse government on the basis of socialist policies.
Despite their occasional socialistic rhetoric, the IUSF and the JVP are bitterly hostile to such a struggle. While the IUSF promotes the fatal illusion that student protests can pressure the government to withdraw its plans, the JVP is proposing an opposition bloc with the right-wing United National Party (UNP) through the establishment of a “national centre to defend free education”. The UNP, an open party of big business, was responsible for initiating the attacks on free public education after it came to power in 1977 and launched its open economy agenda.
The JVP is already backing away from supporting student protests. Amid the vilification of the IUSF by the government and in the media, JVP parliamentarian Anura Kumara Dissanayake told a press conference last week that his party did not approve every action by students. He added that the JVP had “considered approving the setting up of private universities but cannot approve it because of the sorry state the poor people would face”.
This concern about “poor people” is empty posturing. In 2004, the JVP held ministerial posts in the government of President Chandrika Kumaratunga, which implemented a further round of restructuring and privatisation. In 2005, the JVP backed Rajapakse in the presidential election and supported his renewed war against the LTTE to the hilt. Throughout the fighting which ended with the LTTE’s defeat in May 2009, the IUSF and JVP argued that everything, including education, had to be sacrificed to the war effort.
The starting point of any political fight to defend public education is a complete break with all parties of the capitalist class, including the JVP and its student organisation. The attacks on education are part of a far wider onslaught in Sri Lanka and internationally on the living standards of working people. In Europe, the US and around the world, governments are attempting to impose the burdens of the global economic crisis onto workers and youth. The struggle for free education by students is completely bound up with building an independent movement of the working class in Sri Lanka and internationally against the profit system.
Billions of rupees needed to upgrade universities to provide free, high quality education for all youth who want it. That will only take place in the fight for a workers’ and farmers’ government based on socialist policies to refashion society to meet the pressing social needs of the majority, not the profits of a wealthy few. That is the program of the ISSE and the Socialist Equality Party. We urge students to join this struggle by building the ISSE on
campuses throughout the island.
Sooner or later we have to have private universities. For some this looks inappropriate now, but, this is the trend now and it's a good one.
seruvila Wednesday, 03 November 2010 09:03 PM
socialist destroy greece. ignore them. as soon as possible start private universities.
Bernard Wednesday, 03 November 2010 10:06 AM
Its not "international" but privatization is the issue.
Do you want the education to be controlled by Tycoons and public education to face the plight of "CTB"? As far as inequality is prevalent globally, private education may cater to relatively priviledged. Its not an ideal situ to glorify!!!
Hi Daily Mirror, Why you are posting only the against comments? Is it part of your policy?
amjad Wednesday, 03 November 2010 03:31 AM
they are not for profit unis dude
Mervyn Tuesday, 02 November 2010 10:57 PM
It is stupid to protest over the establishment of private universities, In fact it is better when there is an another way of getting educated. If these people are protesting against the universities why don't they protest over private international schools?. At least there will not be any students strikes because you are paying for your education and not like the state operated universities. These protesters are not aware that there are private universities in many countries in addition to state operated and the standards are the same. The only difference is some pay for their degree and others not. .
Jacob Tuesday, 02 November 2010 11:41 AM
Never heard of this gang of robbers...!
Why would anyone listen to the???
Saradial Tuesday, 02 November 2010 11:34 AM
Harvard, MIT also private Universities
Saradial Tuesday, 02 November 2010 11:28 AM
Who cares ISSE!
in naattin mainthan Tuesday, 02 November 2010 06:45 AM
the amount of job opportunities around the university lodging food travelling and so forth also the foreign currency flowing in to this country from overseas students and the tourism industry parents coming to see their children so on and so on benefits benefits if anybody opposing are like frogs inside the well
kosala Tuesday, 02 November 2010 06:33 AM
ahhhh ... one more beggar children from JVP/DNA... how many more do these beggars have ?
Haramanis Tuesday, 02 November 2010 06:01 AM
When I was in Uni there were 2 people of this organisation who acted as secretary, member, poster boy, etc, etc. I donno what happened when those two graduated.
Ranjith Tuesday, 02 November 2010 06:01 AM
If they are "Intenational" than whats the issues. Its for them!. Must support, else this is a contract.
Ranjith Tuesday, 02 November 2010 05:56 AM
cos. JVP and UNP don't have slogens.
Darren Tuesday, 02 November 2010 05:55 AM
Primitive Donkeys.Grow up you mutts.
pema Tuesday, 02 November 2010 05:48 AM
we welcome the news of private unis. Sri-lanka should encorage private education for better products.
Knight Rider Tuesday, 02 November 2010 04:29 AM
Another brick in the wall ?
Milson Tuesday, 02 November 2010 05:47 AM
We like privatization. Lets go ahead. These rascals are wasting tax payers money.
udul prem Tuesday, 02 November 2010 05:22 AM
aahh,, these small small orgs try to save me !!! good good
summa Tuesday, 02 November 2010 05:14 AM
Where have JVP hero Wijeweera studied? was he selected to go to Lumumba on merit?
Accountant Tuesday, 02 November 2010 04:59 AM
These fellows just need to look at India and understand the what they have achieved through private universities. A graduate from Indian Institute of Management (IM) on average earns more than $ 200,000 per year. Which university in Sri Lanka can come close to this? IM graduates lecture in best universities in america and UK alike. People are just waiting to hire these people around the world.
This JVP is no good. I would not have been doing what I am doing today, if I would stuck with the government university education.
commonsense Tuesday, 02 November 2010 04:57 AM
I think its high time the government took a hard stance on this and put a stop to these non-sense!!! dont understand why the so called educated would want to obstruct such a move...
Tilvin Tuesday, 02 November 2010 04:53 AM
Bad news for Tilvin's boys.. cannot do the same gimmicks at private universities..
Hasiya Tuesday, 02 November 2010 04:50 AM
Where the hell did they came up from? May be due to the failure of Udul's Gang being an utter failure, they may have come up with some other name....... Selfish students!!!
pran Tuesday, 02 November 2010 04:49 AM
What is this ISSE talking about 'Social Equality'? Have we seen social equality anywhere in the world? Only making troubles like JVP.
wasala Tuesday, 02 November 2010 04:42 AM
None of their business
Fayad Tuesday, 02 November 2010 04:40 AM
What wrong with private university's ? if they go overseas and enter a university no problem ?? What-sort of policy ??????
Prabath Tuesday, 02 November 2010 04:39 AM
Has anyone heard of this organization??????
DXB Tuesday, 02 November 2010 04:36 AM
Student council not aware the need of this ,
Please consider the followings ;
Look present Huge drain of foreign exchange due to study in foreign country , We can attract Arab & Chinise students if we have leading private university , We have 100 % free education but look at the percentage of graduates , more over these graduates are only good to have leading political process with fine shouting together . Though we have 100 % free education we are popular in middle-east to export House-maids only.
We need revoulution in our system of education.
Imran Hameed Tuesday, 02 November 2010 04:32 AM
The IUSF's and JVP's primitive ideology should crushed and done away with. It is a major hindrance in developing the contry. Govt, we are with you on this.
Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.