27 September 2016 12:02 am
An elephant corridor to be set up between the Kahalla-Pallekele sanctuary and the Hakwatunawa
The elephant corridor will be constructed in the main road between Melsiripura and Polpithigama in Irudeniyaya. The Walagamba primary school is right next to this proposed elephant corridor. The schools have been a blessing to these areas but this school will close down because no parent will send their child to a school bordering the elephant corridor,” he added. “Farmers will lose their lands. If the elephant corridor is to be erected with the intention of improving tourism, then it is also a grave injustice to the already existing and flourishing farming industry, which is the main source of revenue in Kurunegala.
When the elephant corridor is set up, the elephants will ultimately be led to the Hakwatunawa reservoir, which is not a conducive area for elephants. Neither is this area suitable as a tourist destination as there is nothing historical here,” he noted. He added that Hakwatunawa was an area of around 16,000 acres of water where there was no space for elephants.
“There are villages around this reservoir and elephants are ultimately brought to the middle of all these villages, posing a threat to the inhabitants. This is an area where four elephants were killed and around 12 men died after elephant attacks. The wildlife department has no clear plan in dealing with this conflict. No wildlife minister appointed since 1994 has ever given a permanent solution to our concerns related to the elephant corridor and the elephant fence. The wildlife minster clearly stated that the elephant corridor will be opened up towards the Hakwatuna reservoir,” he said. He noted that Irudeniyaya was an area extensively developed by the government through the establishment of new schools, banks and facilities for electricity “It is a pity that an elephant corridor has been proposed amidst all the visible and striking developments in this area. The plan to improve tourism through an elephant corridor is a definite failure. This proposal if executed, will also show how heartless, selfish and unsympathetic our government and provincial councils are.” He also regretted the fact that all proposals were made by officials in Colombo who resorted to mere discussion instead of visiting these areas.
“Kurunegala is part of the coconut triangle. Unfortunately, more than 500 acres of coconut plantations have been destroyed by elephants. When we visited one particular area with Minister S.M. Chandrasena, he was shocked to see 400 plants destroyed. We suggest that the government improve established elephant stations and those proposed to be established in Horowpathana and Galgamuwa. These stations could be improved to facilitate the 10 or 12 elephants in the Hakwatuna area. Then neither an elephant fence nor an elephant corridor would be necessary,” he added.
“Though the government says that one of their prime objectives is the protection of human rights, we have to understand that that is a fallacy. We know that even if they pass 100 cabinet decisions, they will never execute them. We voted for this government on January 8 for a reason. However, this government is following the same footsteps of their predecessor. We are not pointing fingers at anyone but we need to remember that we voted for the President on January 8, so that he would save the people and bring justice. We need the President to take responsibility” he said. He further added that the government should make the relocation of people one of their prime objectives. “They should also execute the policies that they made.
The President came into power because he promised the people that he would not only make decisions but execute them as well.”
“Fishing has been our livelihood since the time of our forefathers. At that time there were no hotels. It was in 1977 that two hotels were constructed. We have been chased to the furthest corner of our land assigned for fishing to facilitate the hotel industry,” said Neville Christie, a fisherman from Batticaloa. “No one in political authority ever asked about our situation. Though the Prime Minister visited us twice, he did not inquire about our plight but merely asked us to leave.
This is unfair. He said we would be given land in Walachchena. But we can’t fish in Walachchena because there would be issues between Tamil and Muslim fishermen, as they have huge boats while our boats are small,” he added. Elaborating on the ethnic conflict he said, “Villagers don’t have jobs either. Recently there was a fight between the Sinhalese and the Tamils in the village and a Tamil man was killed by the Sinhalese. Such tragic outcomes from petty situations could and would erupt in Walachchena as well, if we migrate.” “We will also need a port where we could come to shore and dry our fish. We can’t dry our fish in water! Where we live now is very conducive to our livelihood.
This port is situated in the land the Tourism Board allocated for us. Now they are trying to grab this piece of land and make us destitute,” he remarked. “Our rights have to be protected. We ask the authorities to ensure the protection of our livelihood, which is a heritage. The Tourist Board assures us all the time that out land will not be taken away and that we will forever be their owners. But we need this in writing to be fully assured,” he added. “We are like stray dogs sleeping on pavements, forced to move when a car approaches and lie down when the car has sped away. We are helpless and desolate,” he said. NEVILLE CHRISTIE FROM BATTICALOA
There has not been much investigation into this problem. It was the police who truly took the problem to courts. We have to spend a lot of money for the court cases as well, which is very difficult for our family. My land problem in Kalpitiya is one in so many.”
“There was a time when my brother could not attend a court case and he was taken in to custody because of this. On July 25, we have another court case to attend. We really can’t bear these expenses. Our lands are very close to the kite surfing club and another problem we face is that tourism has adversely affected the fishing industry, which is the livelihood of so many. We are also not welcome on the beach. In some of our lands,
we have coconut trees that contribute to our livelihood. Since the tourism industry came to our shores, many of our coconuts have been stolen and since they have taken some of our land, they have taken our livelihood with it,” she added.