Mon, 27 Mar 2023 Today's Paper

SL envoy reacts to NYT editorial

3 September 2014 08:11 am - 8     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}


Sri Lanka’s Ambassador to the United States, Prasad Kariyawasam said the recent editorial of the US daily, ‘The New York Times’ on Sri Lanka’s refusal to cooperate with the UN investigation, had made ‘insensitive assertions’ about the Island nation.
“To compare Sri Lanka to human rights and humanitarian emergencies elsewhere in the world is unjust,” Ambassador Kariyawasam stated in his response to the editorial.
A version of this letter appears in print on September 3, 2014, on page A22 of the New York edition with the headline: Sri Lanka and Human Rights: An Ambassador’s View.
The response:
Your Aug. 23 editorial “Sri Lanka’s Intransigence,” about the government’s refusal to cooperate with the United Nations investigation into suspected human rights abuses during the country’s civil war, makes insensitive assertions about my country.
Sri Lanka has enjoyed uninterrupted democracy since 1931. Last September we held the first election to the Northern Provincial Council, delayed by more than two decades because of the refusal of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam to politically empower people in the North. Now, the Tamil National Alliance is in control of provincial administration. To compare Sri Lanka to human rights and humanitarian emergencies elsewhere in the world is unjust.
We reject the United Nations investigation because its intrusive nature exceeds its mandate. It challenges the sovereignty of our country; violates basic principles of international law; vitiates the atmosphere needed for reconciliation; and ignores substantial and progressive socioeconomic and political progress already achieved, including the resettlement of 300,000 displaced people and the reintegration of 11,000 armed cadres.
The three-decade-long conflict with many failed attempts at peace because of L.T.T.E. intransigence affected the whole country. Local accountability mechanisms, now strengthened with international experts, are respectful of inherent social, cultural and ethnic susceptibilities, unlike the United Nations-driven process, which serves externally motivated interests and will destabilize the intricate balance of the national reconciliation process.

  Comments - 8

  • ABC Wednesday, 03 September 2014 02:21 PM

    Extremly poor response.A primary student can do better. via DM Android App

    BabyHamu Wednesday, 03 September 2014 09:08 AM

    1. Northern provincial council without land/police is a farce.

    2. "Intricate balance"?? Rubbish.

    chandi Wednesday, 03 September 2014 09:13 AM

    Very good statement....the reason is he is a career diplomat...

    peace Wednesday, 03 September 2014 02:51 PM

    If always America lie why do you stay there Sir come home. Are awaiting for green card.

    antonsunil77 Wednesday, 03 September 2014 12:00 PM

    Hats off to a good diplomat

    Bandarai Wednesday, 03 September 2014 04:37 PM

    Well said Ambassador Mr. Kariyawassam. All other Ambassadors should fallow this. I appreciate you.

    Suq Madique Thursday, 04 September 2014 02:37 AM

    Obviously your solution would be to allow the state of eelam to tamils?

    Chami Thursday, 04 September 2014 07:09 AM

    Thank you sir, job well done.

Add comment

Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.

Reply To:

Name - Reply Comment

Import of South Indian eggs: Sri Lanka walks on Indian eggshells

With the increase in egg prices the government decided to import eggs to regu

Wokeism: Is it destructive, or are you afraid of change? A response

In order to critically discuss a movement, we must first understand its etymo

Defeat in Ananthapuram Battle denoted the LTTE’s end

Many battles were fought during the long war between the Sri Lankan armed for

Wokeism: A Weapon of Mass Destruction?

When can one say they’ve had enough of being in a state of ‘wokeness’ a