Why not give effect to the Human Rights , Media Freedom and Labours rights by new enactment as proposed by the EU related to regain GSP plus ?. It would be more benefcial than pleasing UN . However, it seems that hidden agenda behind this sudden "U" turn.
Gayan Samarasekara Thursday, 30 September 2010 06:21 AM
Someone pl educate the government that the action against nuclear terrorism means, action against Iran.. :P
sltk2004 Thursday, 30 September 2010 06:21 AM
There is not hidden agenda here. No 'U' turn either. This is another act to suppress acts considered as Nuclear Terrorism. We have enough experience with the existing Prevention of Terrorism act. So we will just have to wait and see how this new one would affect us.
Cotton Hall Thursday, 30 September 2010 06:23 AM
This is another way to divert the present attention from poor state of the country. When it rains, lanes become canals, streets become streams and roads become rivers. . We have a lot of other more burning issues that have to be handled.
Managala Thursday, 30 September 2010 06:26 AM
I Think this move is taken since GOSL is focusing on having Nuclear Plant for generating Electricity.If its the reason it has lot of pros and cons good move in aspect of energy and bad move in aspect of Environment... need to strike the balance.
malkanthi Thursday, 30 September 2010 06:32 AM
Nuclear Terrorism? No idea.
terence Thursday, 30 September 2010 06:45 AM
Act 1 scene ii.
Cynic Thursday, 30 September 2010 06:51 AM
Ban Ki Moon might go on a saline fast now.
Calistus Jayatilleke Thursday, 30 September 2010 07:50 AM
Looks like massive change of heart after the visit to UN: Inviting Norway back and carrying out acts to please the UN.
gamaya Friday, 01 October 2010 04:55 AM
Do we have any Nuclear in first place?
Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.