Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa today denied claims that he had antagonised the Western nations by being photographed with his arm around late Muammar Gaddafi of Libya.
“It is actually Gaddafi who has his arm on my shoulder in that much publicised photograph,” the former President said issuing a two-page statement.
He also said that It was also said that when foreign dignitaries came to Sri Lanka to persuade Sri Lanka to stop the war. “… I had deliberately insulted them by taking them to Embilipitiya and giving them manioc to eat, and that that resentment was motivating the Western countries to pass resolutions against us. I have no recollection what was on the menu when the British and French foreign ministers met me in the final days of the war demanding that I halt hostilities.”
“But it is certainly true that I refused point blank to halt the war. It is because I did not buckle under foreign pressure that this country is free of terrorism today. Governments are elected by the people of Sri Lanka to do what is best for the country and not to agree to everything said by foreign powers. That applies to the resolution that has just been passed in Geneva as well.”
Govt.’s duty is to stand by our war heroes
Though the passage of the US sponsored resolution against Sri Lanka in the UNHRC without a vote last Thursday is being hailed as a diplomatic victory for Sri Lanka, I am unable to share that view. Operative paragraph 6 of the resolution affirms the importance of the participation of foreign judges, prosecutors, lawyers and investigators in the Sri Lankan judicial mechanism to be set up to investigate alleged human rights abuses during the war.
Operative paragraph 8 encourages the Sri Lankan government to remove individuals in the armed forces suspected of human rights violations through an administrative vetting process even if there is insufficient evidence to charge them in a court of law. Operative paragraph 4 welcomes the government’s willingness to allow the various judicial and other mechanisms it intends to establish to deal with the past, to obtain financial assistance from overseas, which means that these supposedly Sri Lankan mechanisms will be paid for and maintained by foreign powers.
Those are just a few of the objectionable operative paragraphs in that resolution. After its passage, the Prime Minister said that Sri Lanka has now been ‘taken off the agenda in the UNHRC’. Posters of the UPFA have appeared on the streets hailing the government for delivering the country from the ‘imperialist death trap’ in Geneva. Such statements sit oddly beside the operative paragraphs of the resolution mentioned above.
The mismatch between the provisions of the resolution that was passed and the government’s present mixed signals and rhetoric may be due to a belated realisation that nothing has been gained by Sri Lanka joining the USA as a co-sponsor of this resolution except to commit the government to a course of action which runs contrary to the interests of this country and is therefore politically unfeasible. I acknowledge that there are times when foreign powers try to foist their way of thinking upon other nations and the country at the receiving end has to find ways of dealing with the situation.
The first duty of the Sri Lankan government is to see to it that the interests of our war heroes are looked after. Operative paragraphs 6 & 8 of the resolution run directly contrary to that sacred duty. I regret to note that there is an attempt to whitewash the unfavourable resolution in Geneva by claiming that this was the best that could be achieved and that things could have been far worse with the near certainty of economic sanctions if my government had been still in power.
The withdrawal of the GSP+ trade concession in 2010 and the ban on Sri Lankan fish imports to the EU in January 2015 were mentioned as the forerunners of the sanctions that were to be imposed on Sri Lanka. The public should be made aware that the ban on fish imports to the EU this year was due to issues relating to ‘illegal, unreported and unregulated’ fishing in the Indian Ocean in contravention of the rules of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission and had nothing at all to do with politics or human rights.
As for GSP+, this is a special trade concession of doubtful utility which gives the EU a political handle over the recipient country. In 2010 when GSP+ came up for its quinquennial review and this was being used to impose the EU’s will on Sri Lanka, my government made a conscious decision not to reapply for GSP+. Even after this trade concession was withdrawn, my government ensured that apparel exports to the EU kept growing at more than 6% a year. It should be noted that no major exporting country in Asia has applied for GSP+ due to the political strings attached to it.
It was also said that I had antagonised the Western nations by being photographed with my arm around Muammar Gaddafi of Libya. It is actually Gaddafi who has his arm on my shoulder in that much publicised photograph. In the last months of the war in 2009 when Sri Lanka was fast losing foreign reserves due to the severe global economic recession that year and the IMF under pressure from the Western nations was delaying the standby facility that we were entitled to, Muammar Gaddafi agreed to lend 500 million USD to Sri Lanka in response to a single phone call from me. If not for that pledge, the economy would have collapsed before the war could be won.
It was also said that when foreign dignitaries came to Sri Lanka to persuade us to stop the war, I had deliberately insulted them by taking them to Embilipitiya and giving them manioc to eat, and that that resentment was motivating the Western countries to pass resolutions against us. I have no recollection what was on the menu when the British and French foreign ministers met me in the final days of the war demanding that I halt hostilities. But it is certainly true that I refused point blank to halt the war. It is because I did not buckle under foreign pressure that this country is free of terrorism today.
Governments are elected by the people of Sri Lanka to do what is best for the country and not to agree to everything said by foreign powers. That applies to the resolution that has just been passed in Geneva as well.
I think we forgot things nothing. Also I believe if you want built anything you should be dictator for a while whether others like or not. Because majority like to be do nothing but like criticizes.
Patriot Tuesday, 06 October 2015 08:57 AM
If MR stayed as leader without pre-maturely going into an election, where the Indian RAW and American CIA along with other foreign parties played a major role against the re-election of MR, today Sri Lanka would be on the road to an even higher position surpassing nations economically.Also, Gadafi though a dictator, he looked after his people and was developing Libya rapidly overtaking Western economies and this could be why the West wanted to stop him and not for the Libyan oil. Gadafi in fact had saved so much of funds, some European leaders befriended him and received massive amounts of cash to conduct their own re-election. He was eccentric, but a reliable friend of the poor nations, in times of need.
Upali Dissanayake Tuesday, 06 October 2015 05:07 AM
Obama also a great leader who eliminated the most dangerous religious terrorist animal Bin Laden without any casualities to civilians. Praba stood for an objective whether its right or wrong until his death with hus family. Some political opportunist turn the hat and support whover come to power.
usuf Monday, 05 October 2015 03:56 PM
where was his other arm via DM Android App
Jeff Monday, 05 October 2015 01:13 PM
Gadafi was a dangerous dictator who killed his own people. Mahinda is good in combating religiois extremist who were trying to ruin this country.
Jeff Monday, 05 October 2015 01:11 PM
Yes. He did a great job in Aluthgama but made a mistake in giving minister post to vilpathu hora Budufin and Hakeem who mess up law college exams.
Jeff Monday, 05 October 2015 01:08 PM
Great leader for what? for Aluthgama violence?
mohamed asfar Monday, 05 October 2015 11:15 AM
sir, you did the right thing and destroyed the LTTE. you lost control of the country on the second term and became disoriented in managing the country. thugs started to rule and people pushed you out of power. you and we all losers in this sorry saga.
Katie Monday, 05 October 2015 10:34 AM
If it was the responsibility of the government to safeguard the war heroes why did he not safeguard Field Marshal Sarath Foneska??????
TJ Monday, 05 October 2015 10:24 AM
In short you dug your own grave by anatomizing the west. You are fortunate that you did not face the same fate as that of Gadaafi.
Rasheed Monday, 05 October 2015 10:08 AM
You were the great leader, who destroyed the LTTE, but you allowed your sibblings and supporters to loot and murder, that is the mistake you did. Otherwise you are great.
Sapu Sunday, 04 October 2015 09:13 PM
If MR stayed a few more years we would be like Libya
ANTON Monday, 05 October 2015 09:11 AM
THE REASON IS THAT GADAAFI COULD NOT STAND PROPERLY DUE TO SOME TROUBLE IN HIS LEG.
SIRIBIRIS Monday, 05 October 2015 08:45 AM
GADAFI DID A LOT TO THE LIBYAN PEOPLE, HE DIDNT OBEY TO THE WEST, SO THAT WAS HIS FATE...U ALSO DID A LOT TO SRI LANKAN PEOPLE, BUT U DIDNT OBEY TO THE JUDICIARY AND LAW OF SRI LANKA, SO THIS IS UR FATE
Veda-mama Monday, 05 October 2015 07:21 AM
MR expects everyone to agree with everything he did or everything he said on all matters. A gentleman will always defend himself or others by discussing /arguing on a point that he believes is correct. But will dare not adopt ways and means to "insult" anyone by resorting to such low grade tactics.
raj Monday, 05 October 2015 06:39 AM
Birds of a feather flog together. Is that right?
Sds Monday, 05 October 2015 06:27 AM
Spot on Mahinda Rajapakse. Sri Lanka will be eaten alive and the new sett should no better to be away from US and the western mafia. See no direction , either way west is creating anachy in Sri Lanka.
Indika Monday, 05 October 2015 05:26 AM
Leaders are born not made ... MR you are a still a great leader
mohamed Sunday, 04 October 2015 10:38 PM
before talking anything pls pay the arries money to SLTB
Cobra Sunday, 04 October 2015 10:12 PM
Big deal and where is Gaddafi now?
TONY Sunday, 04 October 2015 09:57 PM
YOU WERE SO RUDE. THAT IS WHY THE COUNTRY WAS UNDER SO MUCH PRESSURE
Premalal Sunday, 04 October 2015 09:25 PM
That showed how quickly he recognised a man of his own calibre.
Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.