Reply To:
Name - Reply Comment
Last Updated : 2023-06-06 01:22:00
Sapu Tuesday, 08 September 2015 09:01 AM
Our existing Dockyard in Colombo is very small, a larger dockyard will do well
kal Wednesday, 09 September 2015 10:26 AM
A very wise decision made. Take examples from Singapore, so many repair berths and thus this become a repair hub. Congratulations Mr. Arjuna
R S S Perera Tuesday, 08 September 2015 09:25 PM
CHEC again ?Beware of another Trojan Horse.
Das Tuesday, 08 September 2015 04:40 PM
No Chinese any more. They oil palms.Readvertise in Europe
Waco Tuesday, 08 September 2015 12:33 PM
Have a well planed 10 year development plan for Hambantota.
Lalith Tuesday, 08 September 2015 10:57 AM
A relief that they understand the importance of infrastructure development
Bala Tuesday, 08 September 2015 09:38 AM
Yes we have to get whatever revenue and put these white elephants to deliver some benefit to the people. All four Hambantota projects are hardly used - Port, Airport, Stadium and Convention Centre and were only to boost Rajapaksa at heavy cost to country. With that money we could have put up so many things - including four large warehouses one in each paddy producing district. No planning cost us a lot.
Bippity Boppity Boo Tuesday, 08 September 2015 09:37 AM
That is nice. Has a study been done on the business model for this project. It is not mentioned in the article. I think people who play cricket should continue to be in the field of sport and not technical projects.
sacre blieu Tuesday, 08 September 2015 09:29 AM
Would be an excellent move, and it should be essential Sri Lankan majority owned and the share ownership of up to 30 % should be broadly distributed to the public with proven credentials , with a major proportion to minorities.. No front or fictitious names should be tolerated. The transfer of these shares should also to be limited and continued to be of ownership to minority interest.
Giabao Tuesday, 08 September 2015 12:20 AM
So it is same process, same parties, and same .............. LOL, LOL,
sanath ekanayake Tuesday, 08 September 2015 08:22 AM
Use your brain. there may be short comings, but harbor was already made, Rectify the faults. and develop the same harbor and make profit. Instead of making fish tank and paddy stores. .,. .. .
Cobra Tuesday, 08 September 2015 07:54 AM
Then the Paddy storage at Mattala is justifiable!
Gontha ponil Tuesday, 08 September 2015 07:20 AM
Seeni gabadawata maru. Goni diyawenne nae ne.
Pxx Tuesday, 08 September 2015 07:19 AM
The greatest governance challenge existed when the organisation, or the environment in which it operated, was moving from one phase of the cycle into another. This required the board and executive to not only identify where they were in the cycle, but also predict the range of potential outcomes that could arise form alternative courses of action during the subsequent phases of the cycle.
Waco Tuesday, 08 September 2015 03:44 AM
Arjuna, make the Mattala Air Port also a viable unit. Undoing is easier, but wasting tax- payers money.
karthi Tuesday, 08 September 2015 02:49 AM
Dockyard at Hambantota is good but ensure that ships will definitely call otherwise it will be the same old song you will have to hear.
karthi Tuesday, 08 September 2015 02:49 AM
Dockyard at Hambantota is good but ensure that ships will definitely call otherwise it will be the same old song you will have to hear.
kumaraya Tuesday, 08 September 2015 02:00 AM
Can we PLEASE have clear details of this "project". Has a detailed study of usage, marketability, costs and ROCs and OWNERSHIP of the dockyard been done? If so, we as citizens want details.
Add comment
Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.
Reply To:
Name - Reply Comment
The death of the 16-year-old girl in Kalutara has been mired in controversy.
Sri Lanka boasts of a 2500 year old Buddhist culture. This culture also inclu
Abortion is illegal in Sri Lanka unless the life of the mother is at risk. Re