New Delhi: India, after signing a road transport agreement with Bangladesh, Bhutan and Nepal, is said to be considering an ambitious bridge or undersea tunnel linking the Indian mainland with Sri Lanka.
India was mulling the project after the Manila-based Asian Development Bank (ADB) suggested that India look at a project linking Sri Lanka, roads minister Nitin Gadkari said at a Mint Conversation, a platform where special invitees interact with Mint staff.
“When I met ADB officials (in June), they told me to look at a connectivity project between the Indian mainland and Sri Lanka as well. They said that they would finance it. They proposed a bridge between Rameswaram and Sri Lanka,” Gadkari said.
“When I recently visited Rotterdam (Netherlands), I visited an immersed tunnel connecting Rotterdam and Belgium. So, it could be an immersed tunnel or a bridge. We are looking at it,” the minister said.
Connectivity as been a key theme in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc) for many years now and a beginning was made when India signed the Bangladesh-Bhutan-India-Nepal (BBIN) transport pact in June in the Bhutanese capital, Thimphu.
The pact was proposed after Saarc, which also includes Afghanistan, the Maldives, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, failed to conclude a motor vehicles pact, along with an agreement on regional railways when the leaders of the eight nations met in Kathmandu in November 2014. This was because Pakistan was unable to secure internal clearances. India-Pakistan squabbles have been blamed for Saarc failing to realize its potential for economic integration.
The BBIN pact seeks to open up vehicular traffic in order to give impetus to trade and sub-regional cooperation, a key element of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s neighbourhood policy.
According to Sri Lankan diplomats, the idea of connecting India and Sri Lanka by a bridge or undersea tunnel has not been broached by the New Delhi government in recent times.
But news reports say the idea of a land bridge or a causeway between India and Sri Lanka was mooted back in 2002 by current Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe in his earlier stint. The idea behind it was to enable trucks from southern India to ferry goods to the Colombo port, one of the largest in the region. However, there were strong objections from some sections in Sri Lanka, who said the plan would mean Sri Lanka will be seen as an “extension of India”, according to media reports.
“It (the idea of a corridor) is a good idea. But I think it will take time to fructify,” said a person familiar with the developments who did not want to be named. “If it works out, it will definitely give a boost to sub regional cooperation within Saarc.”
Currently, India is connected to Sri Lanka by at least 100 flights a week. A ferry link between Dhanushkodi in Tamil Nadu and Thalaimannar in Sri Lanka was snapped in 1983, when the Tamil-Sinhala ethnic conflict erupted in Sri Lanka.
Another ferry service that was started in 2011 between Tuticorin (in Tamil Nadu) and Colombo after the end of the Sri Lankan civil war in 2009, was discontinued as the operator deemed it uneconomical.
NOWAY WILL SRI LANKANS AGREE TO THIS SINISTER PROJECT.
nj Tuesday, 16 February 2016 01:03 PM
disaster for srilanka
johan Tuesday, 16 February 2016 02:34 PM
If this is opened common people can afford to go by road withoutspending much i.e. to and fro.Both side Immigration departments should be established.Like Bahrain-Saudi Bridge
Banja Tuesday, 16 February 2016 04:25 PM
Look after your population problom in your own country ! SL is only 1/60 of India. Leave us alone !!
Wazza Tuesday, 16 February 2016 04:34 PM
Oh gosh no. India has no use to us.
adolf Wednesday, 17 February 2016 11:46 AM
This is sinister.No India, the further you are the better. Take lesson from Europe invasion of unwanted Immigrants.What if those Tamil Nadu piggies start to invade by bridge or tunnel.
Man Tuesday, 16 February 2016 09:34 AM
No use as priority must be given to other important infra-structure developments, in SL.
dinuka Tuesday, 16 February 2016 09:35 AM
This will be the end of Sri Lanka. People already call our country India...
Sham Wednesday, 17 February 2016 03:36 PM
Well i as a srilankan .not agree with this project .india have so much problem to solve.in terms of poverty people have no shelter .no food..not many people have houses to leave or comfortable life..sanitation sucks in india.why dont they look in to this matters .1st..he acually can build the life of poor pple in india .before start to build project which not nesasary.in tamil nadu lots of pple no shelter no food There is alot of street children..can u pls look in to this matters 1st before u start this project...open the eyes and c .its time to change indian children childrens life who have no shelter .no food..no proper education no sanitation.most slep in the street..pls look in to this matters
Erandi Tuesday, 16 February 2016 11:16 AM
OMG!!!!! God bless Sri Lanka !!!!!
Concern Citizen of Sri Lanka Tuesday, 16 February 2016 11:19 AM
Please leave us alone ,we have seen how you treat NEPAL for quite some and other neighbors as well,We Sri Lankans much better off the we are right now.If this project go ahead as plan it will be end of SRILANKA,
AR Tuesday, 16 February 2016 11:20 AM
How come he says that the proposed link is between the "Indian Mainland and Sri Lanka". Does this mean SL is part of India now?
Jayaruwan Tuesday, 16 February 2016 11:50 AM
"I visited an immersed tunnel connecting Rotterdam and Belgium"... There is NO tunnel connecting Rotterdam and Belgium as it would be at least 50km. There is a tunnel on the road from Rotterdam to Belgium but it is only 6.6km long... at lot shorter than the bridge between India and SL needs to be.
Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.