Reply To:
Name - Reply Comment
Last Updated : 2024-04-23 12:32:00
sg Saturday, 11 April 2015 08:00 AM
Good , now public policies making by these organisations ...go head...
n,sarveswaramoorthy Saturday, 11 April 2015 08:09 AM
Political revenge going to affect the progress of the country
Ashroff H Saturday, 11 April 2015 08:42 AM
this project is not acceptable, this is like giving Ealam to China. any country can help, but no country can claim absolute ownership our territory.
Harry Boteju Saturday, 11 April 2015 09:31 AM
Indian Govt. Funded public tribunal !!!
Gamarala Saturday, 11 April 2015 11:32 AM
It looks like most who oppose this project have an ulterior motive. Many are the countries around the world who have developed projects such as this one, without any environmental damage. These objections have no scientific validity. This is progress and we should continue with this project.
iemerald Saturday, 11 April 2015 12:32 PM
what this transparency international should do is present to the public a comprehensive and detailed report ob its findings and exactly it impacts on the people and the economy.all one hears is it impacts on this indudtry that industry, it harms villages etc.
Herath Saturday, 11 April 2015 04:08 PM
Opposing is very easy and cheap propaganda mechanism.
VIRAJ.HEWAGE@GMAIL.COM Saturday, 11 April 2015 04:18 PM
lets go back to stone age and live in caves.
Metteyya Saturday, 11 April 2015 07:56 PM
Why does George Soros - a wealthy American Jew who controls Transparency International get a say in what gets developed or not in Sri Lanka?
snal Sunday, 12 April 2015 04:29 AM
voted for this government to see a positive change in the country, I MADE A MISTAKE!
Jaliya Sunday, 12 April 2015 05:19 PM
Most of Sri Lankans belong in caves..... The way they act and reacts The project without approvals shall be cancelled with no questions asked.
Raja Sunday, 12 April 2015 09:44 PM
Who appointed this Tribunal? Is this another small minded, politically motivated, anti-Chinese Tribunal, not caring for the future of Sri Lanka? The only issue in this project is the ownership of a plot of land by the Chinese company, once reclaimed and this could be changed if the impact is true.
DJ Monday, 13 April 2015 09:28 AM
This project is too much for a small country to handle, think for the next 100 years and make it a 50 to 60 hectre development project and move all banking, export/import operations to the new development which can be a win win situation for both China and Sri Lanka
Siribiris Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:17 PM
How do we know they (TI) is a cleaned body or agent?. The conduct of TI in related to Sri Lanka issues were very pathetic, questionable and harmful to Sri Lanka in the past. Therefore, it is not surprise ti see the " verdict" of this " tribunal". Authorities should kindly check the bank accounts and sources of funding of the " panel of experts and Judges", to understand the motives of this move and,it is very wise to appoint an another " Police Unit" by the Government to very firmly deal with economic Saboteurs.
Add comment
Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.
Reply To:
Name - Reply Comment
On March 26, a couple arriving from Thailand was arrested with 88 live animal
According to villagers from Naula-Moragolla out of 105 families 80 can afford
Is the situation in Sri Lanka so grim that locals harbour hope that they coul
A recent post on social media revealed that three purple-faced langurs near t