Last Updated : 02-09-2014 03:14

 

 
 

Porn stars in papers

E-mail Print
Colombo court Magistrate today ordered Police Headquarters media unit to publicize 83 faces of local porn stars, in the news papers, in order to trace them. (LS)


 
 

Views : 15575
 
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend


Comments 

 
-15+328 # pandula 2010-11-04 12:54
Cant police trace them without doing this coz this will affect their families, children, parents. Ultimate goal is to stop their work so police can do this without doing this recommendations . There may be stories from their sides so its better not to publish their faces on news papers then our bad people will chase for family members too. That is obvious in our society.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-6+186 # Prasanna 2010-11-04 13:17
100% agreed. There is always another side of the story. Moreover, I have heard that some of these videos were filmed clandestinely thus they have technically become Porn-stars. And some were distributed by opportunists (boy friends, paramours etc.)

As TMA says, Why don't they publish photos of Criminals and those who misaapropriate public funds, accept Bribes etc.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3+111 # Dinesh 2010-11-04 15:31
If we publish photos of Criminals and those who misaapropriate public funds...there will be quite alot of people in parliament and Provincial Councils who will have their handsome faces posted on the papers...so instead lets harass the porn stars
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+8 # nikita 2010-11-05 08:01
why in election times they themselves publish photos in every corner, you will be able to see mid level criminals in the upcoming local elections as well
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3+81 # Hasiya 2010-11-04 13:20
very true situation....
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-67+14 # Ranjith 2010-11-04 13:32
They may have done without knowing the damage, but good lesson for those who are on the line as porn work!. Media freedom ans better make these vailable for all and to discourage the wrong doing. Also put tax defaulters and big time smugglers in the paper.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3+81 # lankaputha 2010-11-04 14:18
In Ancient history, a similar thing happened when Jesus was there. He asked, throw the stone at first who has not done a crime. Similarly, let the judges who has never ever looked at a porn picture, give the first photo to the media.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-5+48 # nihal 2010-11-04 14:51
very good challenge, not only watching the picture or film but even more, we know about all these "Sudu redi porawagaththu evun""
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-10+65 # kushantha 2010-11-04 14:37
Oh common guys. What's wrong with these people. Porn is wrong ? It's way of expressing one aspect of human life that every one has to enjoy. Don't be so stupid. Our kings were open minded than fools nowadays. Go to sigiriya and see 5th century expression of sex. Porn is part of sex education and it has to be there to avoid sex maniacs been produced later. It's an art. Way of expressing how you feel about it. These things should be handle with extreme care. Be open minded.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-8+11 # Gihan 2010-11-04 20:20
Now ow, you're seriously mistaken there my friend. Sigiriya is not a "5th century expression of sex"; it's just Art (i.e a drawing). You may know about Mr. Senaka Senanayake. He's probably the most renown, living Sri Lankan artist. Google his drawings, and you'll find loads of nude women. Is that porn? Or the '20th century expression of sex'??

So don't mix-up porn with art.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3+6 # TP 2010-11-04 22:59
Art for some is dirt for others. Porn or not Art is ART.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-4+35 # dil 2010-11-04 14:25
pandula! I appriaciate ur idea..it will definitly be affected for their families and relatives..Why the hell the police cant trace them if they know their faces..
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+26 # lankaputha 2010-11-04 14:37
looks like some big people are expecting a 10% from porn start too... not from money though....
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+41 # Anu 2010-11-04 14:49
hear in sri lanka its ''guilty untill proven innocent''
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+17 # Jix 2010-11-04 18:12
Excellent point and beautifully stated!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-4+138 # TMA 2010-11-04 12:54
What's the point they haven't hurt anyone. Funny thing the photos of theives and murderers R never publicized. The ppl the public shud really B aware of. This only shows that SL has turned in2 a cheap fanatic country
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-6+78 # Ganga772 2010-11-04 12:57
I have heard that some girls do these things pretending the families that they work at top level companies for higher salaries. By doing this parents will get embarrassed
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-49+20 # Dee 2010-11-04 13:36
parents should know what their children doo
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-9+47 # kushantha 2010-11-04 14:41
Children are people who is less than 16. Every adult has right to have sex and if she/he wants to record it. They have the right to distribute it to people who wants to watch them. Of course parents should know what children do not what adults do ? It's their own life.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+16 # Select 2010-11-04 18:00
If any child decide to suicide once these photos are published can any one justfy and happy?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-7+95 # Dr Merv The Silly 2010-11-04 12:57
Not a good move.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+12 # Samarasena 2010-11-04 19:25
Yes, if a politicians mistresses face published.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-15+45 # Porn tharuwa. 2010-11-04 12:58
DM, mage honda lassana picture ekak danne honde. Ketha ewa epa!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-7+69 # ravi 2010-11-04 12:59
this is stupid
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-4+5 # 22/7tin 2010-11-04 13:42
Nobody going to sue DMOL demanding billions of rupees. Fear not.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+3 # 22/7tin 2010-11-04 15:35
Fear Not and publish all the comments posted without publishing something u think extravagant to u'r web site.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+9 # Fair n Square 2010-11-04 18:45
Way to go. I have many of my comments not published coz someone thinks it offends someone. Further at the bottom it says :Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.
BUT most are not edited for spellings, grammar nor even slang YET they choose to not pulicise some decent comments. I do not use unpalimentary language but some of my posts are NOT publicised. I wanna see if this gets its due place.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-4+42 # Kesara Sinha 2010-11-04 13:03
Maybe some politico's girl friend's picture might turn up.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-18+17 # nayomie 2010-11-04 13:04
Effective way to stop but edited images also can end up in the news papers.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3+30 # Ramzeel 2010-11-04 13:06
For some reason or other these people were involved. However their privacy should be maintained because of the social stigma that may be arise.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3+37 # robinson 2010-11-04 13:09
Well, banning porn is a debatable issue and I partially agree it banning not hundred percent. However I am not commenting the court order. As some viewers have said first we should look at their side of the story. We should not pretend to be that we are pure people. We are humans and lets not act as saints for petty political gain.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-4+22 # Teng 2010-11-04 13:11
Haha..what happend to our some parliments members?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3+11 # sham 2010-11-04 13:16
Its better to take preventive actions.
These people may be doing to protect their families.
They may not be doing willingly this job
Publiciing will not good for the entire nation.
Do a rehabilitaion work while giving some sort of living aid to there family members
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3+16 # TMA 2010-11-04 13:18
This will onlyprovoke violence. The typically stupid Sri Lankans will even burn their houses
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+18 # Rikshow 2010-11-04 13:18
Most of them do this for financial reaons.... exposing is not a good idea....
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+20 # Lam 2010-11-04 13:20
when r they going to publish it? i am sure news papers will be out of stock in that day
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+38 # R 2010-11-04 13:24
Damn! They going to publish only the faces :S
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+3 # P.dissa 2010-11-05 04:46
Good one R..!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+35 # the under taker 2010-11-04 13:25
PUBLISH THOSE INVOLVE IN DRUGS/MURDER & MANY CRIMES TO THE PUBLIC 1ST- YOU PEOPLE CANT BCOS- ALL THE POLITICOS BAD ACTIVITIES WILL BE EXPOSED
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+26 # AF 2010-11-04 13:26
I think head of state should stop this erroneous move
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-37+4 # chuuti kolla 2010-11-04 13:26
hey people,you can't comment on court actions in bad manner....
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+4 # Nandimithra. 2010-11-04 17:34
Courts & Judges are not infallible. They may know the Law but this is about people and society and there they fail.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+19 # M.H. Mohd 2010-11-04 13:27
This not a good move as publish thier faces in the news pappers will effect their families...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+20 # Dinesh 2010-11-04 13:27
Good opportunity for any TV station to have another Mega show with these stars.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+25 # Athula K. 2010-11-04 13:31
This is a sensitive issue and as Pandula rightly said, at least some of these porn stars should have unbelievable stories from their side. My view is everything cannot be solved by law, rules and regulations, as the law has only one eye. So as a nation we should watch from both eyes. Authorities should carefully check these ladies and bring them to court if they have violated the law, but the lives of their family members should not be risked, as we have lot of such examples. Having said that, I must mention that no debate about in tracking down these things, as what’s the value of development we are looking forward to gain, without protecting the cultural values of Sri Lankan nation? May they realize this truth!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+27 # chami 2010-11-04 13:31
This is ridiculous. The practice of adultery is not uncommon in our high society, and not to mention with our MP's.Why go so hard on this issue. There are abundance at large, committed grave crimes than this. As mentioned by previous comments social embarrassment on family members would be a concern.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+19 # lankaman 2010-11-04 13:34
With due respect for the judiciary, I think this is a very bad decision. I hope somebody will legally intervene to stop this.

Judges are also human and they too are open to making mistakes. The last bad decision was to again allow loud musical shows after 10pm. On the first such musical show 2 youth were killed.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+11 # Navin 2010-11-04 13:38
Our esteemed law-enforcement bodies seem to be causing as much social harm as they are trying to prevent.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+10 # as` 2010-11-04 13:41
shaa! we can see porn star on our local newspaper
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+10 # Nan 2010-11-04 13:46
sounds like a plan to pacify some extremist close minded group. before doing this someone better think about people who are in this situation unwillingly and also what this will do to their families and loved ones. some of these people have children in schools!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+16 # kap 2010-11-04 13:48
SOME OF THESE POLITIKKAS ARE ALSO PORN STARS..ONLY THING IS THAT THEY ACT BEHIND SCREEN.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+14 # rasika 2010-11-04 13:48
Prostitution is one of the oldest profession in the world. Even some countries have legalized this profession. No countries in the world could stop this. The normal trend with the development one can observe an increase of this type of activities may be due to various reasons. We don't endorse this move.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-4+17 # Faqi 2010-11-04 13:51
This is an utter violation and abuse of the power of the courts.
The damage this would do to innocent family members would be tremendous. This is not Saudi Arabia, we are an enlightened democracy, we should not violate the rights of these individuals.
This magistrate needs to study the law as the rights of the individuals and the society.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+9 # xlntgson 2010-11-04 15:59
@Faqi, in Arabia they won't publish the name of the accused or criminal even in cases of lesser offences, KP was the name given to the Sri Lankan jerk driver who got three months in Dubai!
Publishing names would be a crime against humanity for an example if there is a person in my name then I should release statements that was not me someone etc. xlntgsong was a name removed in the list of such sites, it will be ridiculous and a vague would say "why he is stoutly denying?
He might be the one among"
Same names sometimes with initials people have!
If you go to some towns all are silvas, pereras, appuhamis, mohameds and lingams.....
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+3 # Capsule 2010-11-04 18:26
Faqi do we practice democracy in Sri Lanka???
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3+6 # gayan.w 2010-11-04 13:53
we all know that its parents who pays the price for mistakes commiting by their kids,,those morons who are on porn sites will not care about this,,most of them may not living in sri lanka,,but their parents / relatives / kids / sisters & brothers who are having a respective lives will pay the penalty ,,,,,,lets hope somebody who's wise enough to understand this will stop this court rule,,,,,,,
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+10 # senani 2010-11-04 13:53
this is so stupid..... decision ...it's uncivil ...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+22 # Mervin 2010-11-04 13:55
Better to publish first picture of Karaoke Judge?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+8 # bash 2010-11-04 14:12
Publish the photos of all the persons who took part in producing, the financier, cameramen, hotel owner, manager etc
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+9 # NAS 2010-11-04 14:16
If so they should also publish the pictures of all killers and rapists. Now that will be somewhat useful for the general public.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+5 # sw 2010-11-04 14:17
Pornography is another ailment in this society in addition to gambling, corruption, drugs and lawlessness. Before gunning for pornstars GOSL should try to eradicate the other evil ailments which are destroying the society.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+17 # Kevin 2010-11-04 14:19
Publish photographs of people who rape innocent girls too.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+10 # pornstar 2010-11-04 14:23
Oh, Now I have to hide!!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+5 # jayam 2010-11-04 14:25
This isa very stupid decision.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+5 # Anton 2010-11-04 14:26
Oh! This is very good publicity at no extra cost for those who need publicity for their profession but on the other hand it is basic violations of human rights if these girls have been filmed with web cams without their knowledge. There are so many hidden web cam videos going round in the world and this move to publicise in the papers is very stupid.. As some have commented, there are girls in this trade without the knowledge of their parents and it will be very embarrasing for the parents too. I wonder whether these police officers, politicians and also the ones who are trying to trace these girls haven't visited these brothels and enjoyed the company of these girls?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+7 # Leon 2010-11-04 14:28
Hello,

It is extremely unfair to put their faces in the paper. They may be individually punished but their acts must not put the families into shame. They are human beings and they have parents and families. Please be fair on them.

Leon
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+5 # mnsmart 2010-11-04 14:30
Pl publish the pictures of drug lords too.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+2 # Sumith 2010-11-04 14:31
If they are now leading good life, this will harm them and their families.
Final Option for them may be their former job at brothels.
Pl. do not publish these photos. only get the owners of the porn sites and take actions against them.
Some ladies may have participated this activities wthithout knowing they are being videod.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+5 # Unarmed Gunman 2010-11-04 14:33
These people are not that bad compared to our politicians who suck all our money - steal public money. This decision is too much, there are many many other things to correct in this country, first make those things perfect.
Btw, What is the punishment for Mervin for his question at Paba?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+11 # Sadarana kota 2010-11-04 14:39
Why porn stars in news papers ?...Why not we make prostitution legal in the country...I myself a doctor who knows the growing trend of social diseases and many countries are taking the measure to legalize prostitution..
why not someone take a proactive measure .... Just because pictures are published can someone stop prostitution happening in the Island.. In srilanka SEX is a topic where people are ashamed to discuss even with a doctor, Most teachers doesnt like to teach these subjects at school the exact way they should be teaching, Parents doesnt like to discuss these matters with their children..
Why not the court order to educate children with sex education from 11 / 12 years onwards.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+15 # Modawansa 2010-11-04 14:44
Please also publish the photographs of MP's.We have not seen them in our electrates for a long time.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+2 # Bertie 2010-11-04 14:45
Don't the Police have more serious duties to perform? Also, it is an infringement on the fundamental rights of an individual's sexual preference privately, provided the individual behaves properly whilst in public
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+5 # lankaputha 2010-11-04 14:50
Ane kale Wane wase.. Legislation is giving indirect support for the stars to find more business.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+3 # Vimukthi 2010-11-04 14:53
Is police trying to deputize their job to common people? Print a separate paper with all the criminals faces.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+11 # Saradiel 2010-11-04 14:53
Define Porn Stars! What about the socialite ladies seen in the arms of Minister sons' and Presidential sons? Only the poor can be subjected to this shameful (so called) act which has many clients from the elite. What happens to rising stars who are supposedly made to indulge in a little frolic to gain acceptance. I suppose we have a very very puritan society that cannot be tainted in the slightest way.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+0 # Tissa Godagama 2010-11-05 04:54
socialite is not porn. ur talking from heresay. not any proof. It snot only the poor that do porn and every one involved are published.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+5 # Sadarana kota 2010-11-04 14:54
What is the legal action for prostitution. . Its just a fine not more than Rs 1000/= if im not mistaken, so whats the point in publishing the pics..Is it just a measure to make these STARS embarased..
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+6 # RanFerdi 2010-11-04 14:55
I don't know how you will take this... But as my belief Porn movies is a part of entertainment and this part has to be regulated in a manner that this will not affect adversly to the society.-Such as making everyone aware of ratings and blocking the access of children to these porn material. The fact is most people are scared of the truth and shy off of speaking it. I wonder how many commented above against the porn in life did not watch a porn because its porn..
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+1 # Nandimithra. 2010-11-04 17:39
Yes the Police & Judiciary males will be more than glad to see a porn film but will villify the actors and actresses.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+12 # sam 2010-11-04 14:58
must be a very old judge from the stone age
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+10 # Masroor Mawalid 2010-11-04 15:00
idiots !!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+4 # John Doe 2010-11-04 15:07
these people don't get in to this business because they like showing off their privates. Probably need to feed the kids and pay the bills. this is just wrong!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+1 # lankaman 2010-11-04 15:43
your concern is good. but if we do what you say, then contract killers, drug peddlers and thieves will all say the same excuse.what is important is for the judiciary to examine the context and apply the law impartially.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+2 # Nandimithra. 2010-11-04 17:41
Impartial ? Where in Sri Lanka - if you are powerful you are above the Law vide Merv & others.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+0 # Tissa Godagama 2010-11-05 04:52
agree 100% with lankaman. We cant have double standards just because they are poor/ rich.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+5 # Democrat 2010-11-04 15:16
COURTS SHOULD HAVE HERAT AS WELL NOT ONLY MIND.PLESE CONSIDER THE AFTER EFFECTS OF THIS JUDGEMENT.Some times suicide cases can be heard in near future.PLEASE RE CONSIDER!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+8 # Invictusrilankan 2010-11-04 15:33
This is absolute non sense. In other countries similar things are done. But ONLY for Sex Offenders and Particularly Child Molesters / Paedophiles. This is done so that people can be cautious about these individuals BECAUSE they have a track record of causing harm (physical / emotional) to others. But Porn Stars are not HARMFUL or DANGEROUS (just for the sake of being Porn Stars that is). If that is the case I am sure there are lists and lists of other type of Stars that need to be printed on Papers way before this is done. Building a Human Society with Morals is a Good ideal to have. But we must not forget that Humans are after all The most Intelligent Animal on the Planet.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-4+5 # Anjula 2010-11-04 15:37
Banning porn sex sites is very very important. But publishing photos to peopls is very bad Action. Because I have seen most of porn videos taken by someone hidding to them. So what happenned tha inocent people who really don't know that someone is getting viedos while they having sex. this action is directly reflect to them to be caught & be harrasment from others( Police Officers, Etc.... ) so My idea is to stop this immediate & keep full stop to porn sex sites like countries as Saudi Arabia where i am working now
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+0 # Siripala 2010-11-05 18:21
If they have banned these sites in Saudi how did you watch them?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+4 # Nish 2010-11-04 15:40
The courts should definitely re-consider this matter. Isn't our country supposed to be the DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRILANKA?????
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+6 # srinath gunaratne 2010-11-04 15:47
Not only the porn actresses, The Rest of the hypocratic clan who visit them at night should also be published. Is this true Buddha's land?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+5 # sinnan 2010-11-04 15:50
it's obvious that our judges go to karaoke & Nightclubs which is their freedom.
Why only punish these poor porn stars by publishing their face in news papers without taking action against the people who organize filming and screening? don't have their freedom?
Are these pornography is published in news papers?
Is it the police want News papers to include porn materials?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+0 # Tissa Godagama 2010-11-05 04:47
going to nite clubs is not porn :) getting paid to screw on camera is. The people who organized this just did their job. They didnt force anyone to do it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+4 # Cyril Fernando 2010-11-04 15:53
We know they take to the stage durring elections and appear on the Walls.So no need to publish them again
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-5+15 # banana republic 2010-11-04 15:53
Welcome to the law of the jungle under MR.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+6 # Padma 2010-11-04 16:05
As all given comments ,this verdict is an unnecessary thing and creating nother problems….. counrty law and order service is paralyzed in sri lanka now. They don’t know what are the needs and give the priority.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+2 # Four Eyes 2010-11-04 17:44
Well they could just publish the photos without saying what they are wanted for, but they should do that together with the pictures of other people wanted for questioning over other matters. The wanted poster is a useful tool but I believe it has been done away with because the same pictures will appear on political posters and people will get confused.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+5 # asfar 2010-11-04 17:51
some porn stars are victims of rouges. please be careful not to expose them.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+2 # ranjith 2010-11-04 18:22
Where we are heading ? Looks everything turns upside down.
We are living in a fool's paradise.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+4 # teri amara 2010-11-04 18:23
Hey! Porn Stars!!
Many will rush to them for autographs
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+4 # dp 2010-11-04 18:26
very confusing..whatever pictures or videos should be well scrutinized before publishing a picture..there would be so many which were captured on hidden cameras without their consent.. trying out a dress in a changing room of a store , could end up in a newspaper as a porn star....it's serious issue ..
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+3 # concerned 2010-11-04 18:41
I guess some of these videos are filmed by couples who are in love and later the boyfriend distributes them as an act of revenge for ending the relationship. I'm speculating here, but this could have very well happened in some cases. I sincerely hope that this won't result in any suicides. In a society where premarital sex is largely taboo, one wonders how people would cope with this.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+1 # garawi 2010-11-04 18:50
Not a good idea! Instead fine them heavily and send to correction centres, not jail them. We need to remember some women are driven to this kind of activity due to poverty ! They need help to overcome it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+3 # Imran Hameed 2010-11-04 18:51
After the war, we all hoped for things to turn out better for Sri Lanka. But everyday we are seeing irrational behaviour and thinking. Decision are being made out of ego and emotions of a twisted nature. Its monkeys rule. God bless Sri Lanka
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+1 # Faqi 2010-11-04 20:30
# xlntgson - You missed the point I was trying to make. What I stated was that rights of individual citizens are not violated in a true democracy. I mentioned KSA as individual rights are not important or respected in that country.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+4 # Mamai Rajja 2010-11-04 20:57
pls include Dr.mervin silva's pictures also,he also kind of porn star.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+1 # Che 2010-11-04 22:23
Kukku Patiya no?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+4 # Neomal 2010-11-04 21:35
What about the faces of bribe takers and rogues in the ....?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+5 # Henry 2010-11-04 21:45
The public already know who the porn-stars, because they are in parliament.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+5 # srilal 2010-11-04 22:19
so its better not to publish their faces on news papers ,,,this maybe result in many suicides,,,,
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+2 # Nissanka 2010-11-04 22:54
There is a sinhala proverb! Hangi hangi wes bandata, natanna wenne elipita. Means you can dress in secrecy, but you have to dance in open.
But remember. There are worse things are happenning in this Banana Republic today for which these so called judiciary is dumb. Charge me for contempt of court. 'Paththa giyath aththa kiyanawa'.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+4 # kanishka 2010-11-04 22:57
Vatsyayana wrote Kamasutra in 2nd century, if he was living today he would have directed so many films based on his famous book and would have won a record number of Oscars. India knows it very well; otherwise if they too decided to publish photos of their talented porn stars, there would be a big shortage of newspaper materials in the world. Unfortunately still Srilanka is living in the Victorian age, and lawmakers of the country should advice the rulers to change the existing laws to suit the present day needs. Please study the human behavior for that best way is to go through the famous Kinsey Report.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+2 # Prof Wickramatillake 2010-11-05 06:04
While its a shameful act, stigmatizing them is a gross HR violation
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+2 # Nalin 2010-11-05 08:20
Culdn't wait to see them...Thanks magistrate sir.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2+1 # pippa 2010-11-05 08:52
What madness. First, it was banning animal sacrifice. Now, this! Soon, Botswana will be a better place to live in.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+0 # polkiccha 2010-11-05 12:04
for you yes botswana is a good place. How come animal sacrifice and porn make it a better place to live unless you are savage person?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+0 # Modawansa 2010-11-05 09:56
with their contact numbers?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+0 # suresh 2010-11-05 11:11
bad move

bad publicity is good publicity

this move will make porn more attractive with new face
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+0 # Obama Ldaen 2010-11-05 11:12
Srilanka+ Afganistan= srilankistan!!! !
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+2 # suresh 2010-11-05 11:14
How many MP and Minister will be contacted by this porn stars for their help???????? and will the media put their faces on the paper??????????
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+2 # liyange 2010-11-05 12:07
dirty politics may be behind this dicision. Our country is going in to a huge economic crisis and the gov want to restrict it in developing a political cricis. They need some isuues regularly to mislead the masses. If they want to show such justice, why don't publish all criminals including dirty politicicians and their henchmen.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+2 # Above the crowd 2010-11-05 12:47
We still have a lot of brain less donkeys in high places.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+1 # Senseless 2010-11-05 12:50
Doesn't our police have more worthwhile work to do than running after porn stars. What a person does with his life is his right and if it does not affect other people there is no justice in hunting them. Can our judges direct this inefficient police to go after criminals, drug dealers, murderers who are a bane to the society rather than going after individuals doing what they want. Or is the law implementeors looking for porn stars to satisfy their lust.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+0 # Sarah 2010-11-05 13:21
is this not a violation of Fundamental Rights? Not in favour of pornography but is that not allowed in a democratic country?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+1 # Calistus Jayatilleke 2010-11-05 15:14
One cannot understand why this fuss about publishing the faces of the so called porn stars in the media, when they themselves are not ashamed to even show their private parts in pornographic videos which are in any case in the public domain ?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+2 # Senaka Wickramasingh 2010-11-05 17:32
The face must be deleted and the rest of the body must be published. Ha ha haa
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-0+1 # oshanda 2010-11-05 18:13
This is a disgrace to most of the innocent women in these videos calling them porn stars, who were filmed by their husbands or boy friends,and circulated thru MMS, they are further humiliated by this way.
Last week Girl in India Committed suicide after her boy friend circulated the MMS, we could here more cases like this after this.
why do not these ppl bring these shameless boy friends and husbands' faces to papers for this shameless act.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1+1 # Siripala 2010-11-05 18:20
We will be able to see most of the famous teledrama actresses among this 83. So I don't see a point in publishing them on newspapers as we see them everyday on tv.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Harin in Passara
Series win
Aren’t they tasty?
Chinese beauties visit Minneriya
Harin in Passara
Series win
Aren’t they tasty?
Chinese beauties visit Minneriya