Last Updated : 2019-07-16 06:36:00

Appointing of chairman and directors to public institutions

8 January 2019 12:00 am - 0     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

A A A

The President and Prime Minister should to work collaboratively to ensure the SOEs are properly resourced and managed
 
 
To improve SOEs’ performance and following many controversial appointments to State-owned enterprises in the past, President Maithripala Sirisena has issued fresh instructions on selection criteria in a bid to eliminate controversial and poorly qualified candidates. 
 
Issuing a circular to all ministry secretaries, President’s Secretary Udaya Seneviratne informed all ministry secretaries that all appointments should be first cleared from his Office. The Prime Minister also has said it is a good concept to follow when appointing people to key institutions. 
 
The President has proposed to appoint a committee comprising public officials to decide on these appointments. The quality of the appointments will however depend on the quality of the people appointed to select the directors and chairman. This should have also been the case for selecting secretaries to key ministries. 
 
Given the capability and bandwidth of our public service, the ability to effectively match skills and personality to a specific job function has always been challenge. In the private sector this is a vital component of successful management and leadership.
 
Picking the wrong person for a key task in the government has been a major reason for failure in the public sector and for squandering tax payers money. The other challenge for the public sector is paying a competitive salary. This is crucial to recruit and retain top talent. To recruit and retain well-qualified and professional human capital, it’s vital to pay a salary that matches or exceeds industry. This is not possible in the public sector.
 
 
Ministries
The other challenge is the allocation of institutions to Ministries, it would be prudent to allocate them on the basis of similarity of subjects. In the past subjects and institutions have been allocated to ministries illogically. For example, all institutions under the Banking and Finance sector (excluding   Employees Trust Fund Board), all institutions under Insurance & Lotteries and Hotel Developers Lanka Ltd (under Marketing & Distribution), Lanka Hospitals Ltd (former Apollo Hospital) have been allocated to the Ministry of Public Enterprises. 
 
The Central Bank of Sri Lanka, which regulates all banks and financial institutions, was under the Ministry of Economic Affairs & National Policy. Thus the financial policy of the Government has to be implemented by two totally different Ministries. This resulted in conflicts of policy. Therefore it was prudent to cluster the Central Bank and all State Banks & Financial Institutions under the 
Finance Ministry. 
 
Similarly, other State-owned Enterprises can be allocated to Ministries with related functions. For example, the institutions under Health must be slotted in under the Ministry of Health while the Ministry of Media which should be an independent ministry, must have the institutions named below (under media) under it. 
 
 
Benefits
Proper clustering of institutions with similar functions in one ministry will automatically ensure the concentration of experts in that field in that ministry. It will enable the minister in-charge to strategize and focus on the development of the functions and optimize the income generation opportunities of institutions under him. To do this he needs a competent team.
 
Allocation of institutions to ministries 
These are the institutions that are under the purview of the Parliamentary Committee of Public Enterprises (COPE):
Banking & Finance
  • Bank of Ceylon
  • Peoples Bank
  • National Savings Bank
  • State Mortgage and Investment Bank
  • Housing Development Finance Corporation (HDFC)
  • Lankaputhra Development bank
  • Pradeshiya  Sanwardena Bank
  • Sri Lanka Savings Bank
  • ETF
Insurance
  • Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation
  • National Insurance Trust Fund
  • Sri Lanka Export Credit Insurance Corporation
  • Agriculture and Agrarian Insurance Board
Energy
  • Ceylon Electricity Board
  • Ceylon Petroleum Corporation
Ports
  • Sri Lanka Ports Authority
Water
  • National Water Supply and Drainage Board
Aviation
  • Airport and Aviation Services (SL )Ltd
  • Sri Lankan Airlines
  • Mihin Lanka
Commuter Transport
  • Sri Lanka Transport Board
Construction
  • State Engineering Corporation of Sri Lanka
  • Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau
  • State Development and Construction Corporation
Livestock
  • Milco Ltd
  • National Livestock Development Board
Plantation
  • Sri Lanka State Plantations Corporation
  • Janatha Estates Development Board
  • Kurunegala Plantations Ltd
  • Elkaduwa Plantations Ltd
  • Chilaw Plantations Ltd
  • Kalubovitiyana Tea Factory Ltd
  • Sri Lanka Cashew Corporation
Non Renewable Resources
  • Lanka Mineral Sands Ltd
  • Lanka Phosphate Ltd
  • Kahatagaha Graphite Lanka Ltd
Lotteries
  • Development Lottery Board
  • National Lottery Board
Health
  • State Pharmaceuticals and Manufacturing Corporation of Sri Lanka
  • Sri Lanka Ayurvedic Drugs Corporation
  • State Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  • Sri Jayawardenapura General hospital
Media
  • Independent Television Network Ltd
  •  Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corp
  • Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corporation
Marketing & Distribution
  • Sri Lanka Handicraft Board
  • State Timber Corporation
  • STC General Trading Company
  • Lanka Sathosa Ltd
  • State Printing Corporation
  • Ceylon Fisheries Corporation
  • Ceylon Fishery Harbour Corporation
  • Ceylon Fertilizer Company Ltd
  • Colombo Commercial Fertilizer Company Ltd
  • Hotel Developers Ltd
Way forward 
State institutions can best serve national, economic, and social goals by performing efficiently and effectively and thereby generating surpluses and contributing to the national budget. SOE management therefore, must encourage a competitive work culture by hiring and retaining talented individuals and encourage meritorious people to join them. The perception that SOEs are hierarchical and bureaucratic, where job promotions are based more on personal connections and seniority rather than performance discourage talented people to join their ranks. 
 
Therefore, performance-based competitive salary and benefits packages must be designed to attract talented people to key institutions. Some SOEs such as China Mobile, the PRC’s largest mobile service operator, offer salary packages comparable to those offered by 
multinational corporations. 
 
When applicable, SOEs should therefore provide higher compensation packages for critical jobs and the selection must be done in consultation with people who have the ability to effectively match skills and personality to a specific job function.
(The writer is a HR Thought leader)

  Comments - 0


Add comment

Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.

Reply To:

Name - Reply Comment


Sri Lanka yet to play to their potential--Rumesh Ratnayake

After England amassed 397 runs against Afghanistan—the highest in the tourn

Dinesh Chandimal- 2018 ODI Captain to 2019 World Cup ‘spectator’

In 2018, Dinesh Chandimal scored 298 runs at 42.52 in One-Day Internationals

Singling out of Rishad Bathiudeen as a political target

The orchestrated political campaign by the Mahinda Rajapaksa-led opposition i

TWISTS AND TURNS in the Dr. Shafi controversy

The sterilization charges against Dr. Seigu Shihabdeen Mohamed Shafi from the

MIRROR CRICKET