Post-independence reflections: Gaps in our freedoms

6 February 2020 09:02 am - 1     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

A A A

 

Seventy two years ago, Sri Lanka gained independence from the shackles of British rule. This meant the autonomy to govern our people, the freedom to create and maintain our institutions and the ability to carve our own political narrative. Beyond political liberty, independence also restored our control over land, resources and Sri Lanka’s economy; we obtained the prerogative to our prosperity. 


Reflecting upon the speech delivered by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa on Independence Day, it is clear that the modernisation of restrictive and out-dated systems, ensuring the increase of efficiency within the local institutions and curbing corruption are well within the new government’s mandate for the country. Upon welcoming this anniversary and amid the dawn of a new decade, it is important that we do more than celebrate the past – it is time to reflect on the extent to which we have secured our future.


The most recent revision of the Economic Freedom of the World Index ranks Sri Lanka at 104, out of a total of 162 countries. While our ranking places us at the lower end of the spectrum, we fare exceptionally poorly on the ‘Legal System and Property Rights’ indicator with an overall score of 4.91 out of 10. It is clear that Sri Lanka has taken certain measures and improved our overall score for Economic Freedom throughout the past few decades and consistently increasing its ratings, apart from the slight deviation from 2015-2017. However, our pace towards such progress and reform has been sluggish compared to that of other countries and our regional competitors. This is reflected in our overall rankings on the index as they have consistently deteriorated from 1980 (ranked 68) to 2017 (ranked 104), even as our scores inched higher over time.  


Given the relative progress and prosperity of other nations that have scored and ranked higher on the index (such as Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and India), it is evident that Sri Lanka has to prioritise similar reforms – starting with our most vulnerable areas – in order to improve our economic and political future.

 


Main problem areas
Under the ‘Legal System and Property Rights’ indicator, our lowest performances are for the sub-indicators ‘legal enforcement of contracts’ and ‘impartial courts’, where we score 3.61 and 3.74 out of 10, respectively. Sri Lanka’s legal system is notorious for being riddled with corruption, lack of transparency and inefficiency. 


In 2018, the Justice Ministry revealed that 697,370 court cases had been brought forward from 2017, in addition to the cases filed that year itself; at the end of 2018, a total of 775,620 cases that were due to be settled were still pending in court.  


Despite the effects of the 19th Amendment to the constitution that significantly curtailed the excessive control and influence of the executive, alleged corruption and manipulation of the judiciary has still been prevalent due to the persistence of political appointments and the intimidation and transfer of judges upon behaviour that is unfavourable to those in power.  
Therefore, the ability to hold politicians and officials accountable has remained challenging, especially in the lower courts, leaving civilians untrusting of and unsupported by the legal system. 


Furthermore, the time and cost required to enforce a contract through Sri Lankan courts is considered extremely arduous and time-consuming, compared to the processes of other economies within our region; we rank 164/190 with an overall score of 41.2/100 for ‘Enforcing Contracts’ under the Ease of Doing Business index published by the World Bank.


The state of property rights in the country is similarly complicated and ruptured. While there are many delays and inefficiencies in procedures such as registering property, some of these issues are often linked to issues within the legal system as well.


The inability to quickly settle minor disputes over land ownership and the struggle to find relevant records within out-dated systems of data collection further deteriorate our standing in terms property rights. Sri Lanka scores particularly low on the sub-indicator ‘Quality of the land administration index’ under ‘Registering Property’ for the Ease of Doing Business index 
(scoring 5.5/30).

 


Impacts of our weak systems
Apart from affecting the general security, autonomy and free-will of individuals within our country, Sri Lanka’s inability to maintain and improve the status of its legal systems and property rights has had significant impacts on the state of our economy and future prosperity as well.


The perceived instability and corruption within the legal system often lead potential investors and business away from the country due to their doubts about the strength of the rule of law and its enactment. The likelihood of commercial disputes being prolonged and unjustly handled by the courts further harms our prospects of attracting local and foreign commerce into Sri Lanka. The inefficiencies of the legal system also render it an unreliable solution to the woes of local entrepreneurs and small businesses, acting as a legal barrier to their growth and development.


Moreover, the disputes, bureaucracy and technicalities that convolute property ownership in Sri Lanka further deter the emergence and growth of new businesses and entrepreneurs that could enrich our economy. For example, the inability for many individuals, such as farmers, to secure titles to their land severely curbs their ability to invest and make full use of the property they cultivate within. 


It also inhibits the growing land markets and the potential to use land as collateral within the country. Such issues squander the potential of our youth, resources and skills and ultimately hinder the progress of our entire nation.

 


Pathway to reform
Given the above problems and their precarious effects on our economy, it is clear that Sri Lanka needs to prioritise reform for its two most vulnerable areas that have long been neglected by politicians and those in power. 


Readdressing the promises brought out by the former Digital Infrastructure and Information Technology Minister Ajith P. Perera, in September 2019, one major leap in streamlining and reforming our legal system would be looking towards digitisation. While it would be a long-term investment and a difficult step for Sri Lanka, it would be a crucial step that may concurrently curb the corruption, manipulation and inefficiency of our current system as well as improve upon the system’s transparency and accessibility to the public.


As Dr. Laksiri Fernando presented in 2019, digitisation of the court system “could not only expedite legal proceedings, crime control and civic justice” but also “ensure common standards throughout the country” in terms of how proceedings take place and how all citizens are treated within the court system. Human errors and language barriers may also be overcome while reducing the time and cost of legal proceedings for both the government and civilians.


Furthermore, the digitisation of legal records, including those related to land ownership, could prevent the misplacement and damage of relevant documents in the case of necessity. The ‘e-land’ initiative by the Registrar General’s Department to enable the digital protection and registration of legal documents pertaining to movable and immovable properties may be considered a good first step. 


In his speech, the president acknowledged the importance of an independent judiciary “for the well-being and advancement of any democratic society” as well as affirmed the need to revise systems that prevent people from freely undertaking self-employment or engaging with businesses.  While this admission on the need for reform is commendable, it is necessary that we ensure it more than mere rhetoric that placates us as weak institutions persist over time. 


A completely functional digital court system may still be quite a challenge that will require constant dedication and fruitful efforts in order to be successfully implemented. In the meantime, it is crucial that the government takes all possible measures to focus on the improvement of our legal sector and the fortification of our property rights as they are fundamentals to ensuring the protection of individual liberty as well as the state of our economy. 


Free from the limitations of our colonial past, land and time are priceless resources that are well in our hands; Sri Lanka’s progress is now contingent upon our prioritisation. Ultimately, a nation is only as independent and free as its people are; if Sri Lankans cannot be promised security through law and access to land, it appears the fight for freedom is still ongoing. 
(Erandi de Silva, a Research Intern at the Advocata Institute, can be contacted at erandiyasara@gmail.com and @randyyrando on Twitter. Learn more about Advocata’s work at www.advocata.org. The opinions expressed are the author’s own views. They may not necessarily reflect the views of the Advocata Institute or anyone affiliated with the institute)

  Comments - 1

  • Seth Perera Thursday, 06 February 2020 12:16 PM

    This is so insightful. Can't wait for more papers discussing this topic.


Add comment

Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.

Reply To:

Name - Reply Comment




Murder most foul

Sixty-one years ago on September 25, 1959 Solomon West Ridgeway Dias Bandaran

What went wrong in Kandy?

Tragedy struck when a five-storey building caved in and collapsed, killing a

The 20th Amendment Bill Lest We Forget

Strident calls were repeatedly made from many quarters for the 19th Amendment

Public transport 'side-laned'?

“Miss, mantheeru neethiya nisa api bus passen yanna one. Ithin drop eka par