Wed, 21 Apr 2021 Today's Paper

Fonseka files election petition

16 February 2010 07:06 am - 16     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

A A A

By S.S. Selvanayagam


Former Presidential Candidate General Sarath Fonseka filed an election petition at the Supreme Court this morning seeking a determination from the Court that the election of President Mahinda Rajapaksa at the recent Presidential election was void.

In the petition filed through his lawyers General Sarath Fonseka, who is now under detention, cited the President and 20 others as well as the Elections Commissioner Dayananda Dissanayaka. 

He is asking the Court to order a scrutiny of all the ballots cast at the said election held on January 26, to be carried out by Commissioner of Elections and his staff in his presence and in the presence of other 21 candidates or their authorized representatives.

He cited Mahinda Rajapaksa and other 21 candidates including Sarath Kongahage and Elections Commissioner Dayananda Dissanayake as well as two senior lawyers namely President’s Counsel Razik Zarook and kalinga Indatissa besides Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corporation Chairman Hudson Samarasinghe and Wimal Weerawansa as Respondents.

Razik Zarook, Kalinga Indatissa, Hudson Samarasinghe and Wimal Weerawansa have, according to the Petition, been  cited as parties as they have allegedly committed the corrupt practices as agents of the Candidate Mahinda Rajapaksa. Sarath Kongahage has, the Petition claims, already been made a party hereto and has committed the corrupt practices as an agent of the candidate Mahinda Rajapaksa.

The Petitioner stated that the election of Mahinda Rajapaksa to the office of the President is void and/or undue on any one or more of the reasons of the occurrence of the incidents and the commission of the acts, there was general intimidation, general treating, general bribery, misconduct and other circumstances, non-compliance with the provisions of the Presidential Act, corrupt practices,  by reason of which the majority of voters were or may have been prevented from electing the candidate whom they preferred, namely Fonseka.

Petitioner alleged that there was general bribery committed in connection with the election of Mahinda Rajapaksa or with his knowledge or consent or by his agents. These acts of bribery took place between November 23, 2009 and January 26, 2010(date of election).

Petitioner complained that there were other misconducts or other circumstances which occurred during the above said period. These incidents were also contrary to the Guidelines issued by the Commissioner of Elections dated December 8, 2009 and consisted of the use of State resources towards promoting of the candidature of Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Petitioner Fonseka complaining of false statements in relation to his personal character stated that 1st Respondent Mahinda Rajapaksa, during the last few days of the election campaign, falsely and presented a fake document purporting to be an alleged agreement between him and the Tamil National Alliance which would lead to the division of Sri Lanka in the event of Fonseka being elected President.

He also stated that Sarath Kongahage, Hudson Samarasinghe and Wimal Weerawansa as agents of Mahinda Rajapaksa during the last few days of the election campaign, falsely alleged and presented a fake document purporting to be an alleged agreement between him and the Tamil National Alliance to the same effect.

He complained that commencing approximately at 1.00 p.m. on the day of Election of January 26, Sarath Kongahage, Razik Zarook, Kalinga Indatissa, Hudson Samarasinghe and Wimal Weerawansa made false statements, that the Petitioner Sarath Fonseka was not qualified to be elected as the President, and that even if he was elected as President, he will be disqualified from holding such office. These false statements were broadcast without break until the close of poll at 4.00 p.m. by the Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation, Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corporation, Lakhanda and the Independent Television Network (ITN), he alleged.

He claimed that these false statements were made and broadcast with the knowledge and consent of Mahinda Rajapaksa.

He said there were instances of non-compliance with the provisions of the Presidential Act and that threatening and chasing away by UPFA thugs of counting agents of all candidates and the failure of the election officers and police and security forces personnel to prevent this and thereafter election officers continuing with the count in the absence of the said counting agents.

Petitioner pleads that by reasons of the separate and/or cumulative effect of the facts and circumstances set out in the Petition, the majority of electors were or many have been prevented from electing the candidate whom they preferred, namely Fonseka and that the said election was not free and fair and that the 1st Respondent Mahinda Rajapaksa is guilty of the corrupt practice of treating, bribery and making false statements.

He claims that by reason of the separate and/or cumulative effect, the election of the 1st Respondent Mahinda Rajapaksa is void and/or undue, and the Petitioner (Fonseka) ought to have been returned.

See Kapruka's top selling online shopping categories such as Toys, Grocery, Flowers, Birthday Cakes, Fruits, Chocolates, Clothing and Electronics. Also see Kapruka's unique online services such as Money Remittence,News, Courier/Delivery, Food Delivery and over 700 top brands. Also get products from Amazon & Ebay via Kapruka Gloabal Shop into Sri Lanka.

 

  Comments - 16

See Kapruka's top selling online shopping categories such as Toys, Grocery, Flowers, Birthday Cakes, Fruits, Chocolates, Clothing and Electronics. Also see Kapruka's unique online services such as Money Remittence,News, Courier/Delivery, Food Delivery and over 700 top brands. Also get products from Amazon & Ebay via Kapruka Gloabal Shop into Sri Lanka.

 

 
  • Tuesday, 16 February 2010 07:47 AM

    Very well done. A good start. It is time somebody took a bold initiative to expose fraud rather than accept things as they are saying this is our Karma, as the majority would prefer to do in this country. Even God will help only those who help themselves.

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 07:49 AM

    Bravo!
    May the truth prevail.
    N.A.

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 07:52 AM

    Yes this is good. Both parties allege each other.... We the citizen do not know the truth. if all politicians go to court to bring wrong doing to the justice it is much better. rather than alleging each other just to pull the votes of the crowd....

    because we the sri lankan still believe in justice.

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 07:58 AM

    THERE ARE TWO CHOICES FOR PEOPLE OF SRI LANKA NOW , DIE LIKE A HERO OR LIVE LIKE A COWARD , WE ARE ALWAYS WITH YOU .........

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 08:03 AM

    All Sri lankans were waiting for this.
    We hope and pray for a very good response from the Hon.Judges.

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 08:03 AM

    Well SF has got guts. A great move indeed.

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 08:03 AM

    ane nikan palayan ban yanna........maamala baaanala ekka horakan karala athe maattu wellaa dan redi nathuwa usawi yanawa...hora wahaganna........nikan peechan wennanthuwa palayan doooo yannna

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 08:07 AM

    May the blessings of all the gods be with you, and we sincerely appeal to the judiciary to be impartial and not bow down to the wishes of the king and the princes

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 09:31 AM

    Good for the next election. They know the result is true. But they want to keep their supporters moral up. That's all.

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 09:33 AM

    There's nothing about guts. Everytime opposition file pettitions as usual after election. You are soo "lamakai"

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 09:35 AM

    welldone genaral

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 09:36 AM

    Sour grapes. SF & Co waited so long to file his election petition - just like his political life. What a sad story. Isnt it time to give up.

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 09:38 AM

    Sir, you are made of steel and your convition to fight injustice has no boundaries. I have no doubt Mother Lanka is very proud of you****

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 09:48 AM

    After all, will our judges be impartial?

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 09:50 AM

    Not all Sri Lankans are waiting for this...only who are traitors wiating for this....

    Tuesday, 16 February 2010 09:50 AM

    Unfortunately, none of these charges could be proven beyond reasonal doubt. Wait and see without jumping the gun!


Add comment

Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.

Reply To:

Name - Reply Comment




What is in a meme?

As fun as memes are, what do they mean for our mental health? An expert has a

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied!

Two years after the Easter Sunday carnage people are left with false hopes an

Cinematic links between director Lester and actor Gamini

Sinhala cinema’s pioneering director Lester James Peries is the Sri Lankan

Difficult to forgive Easter Sunday bombers: Brother of tourists killed in Sri Lanka

This year marks two years since the deadly Easter Sunday attacks in Sri Lanka

See Kapruka's top selling online shopping categories such as Toys, Grocery, Flowers, Birthday Cakes, Fruits, Chocolates, Clothing and Electronics. Also see Kapruka's unique online services such as Money Remittence,News, Courier/Delivery, Food Delivery and over 700 top brands. Also get products from Amazon & Ebay via Kapruka Gloabal Shop into Sri Lanka.