SLFP, UPFA won't let it be signed: Minister

7 March 2017 09:13 am - 3     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

A A A

The UPFA which is one of the main coalition partners of the Unity Government yesterday vowed not to allow the government to sign the Hambantota Port agreement with China Merchant Ports Holdings because in its present form it was extremely harmful to our national interests.

United People's Freedom Alliance (UPFA) General Secretary and Minister, Mahinda Amaraweera said Ports and Shipping Minister Arjuna Ranatunga had already highlighted the controversial clauses in a letter to the Government's Privatization Chairman Minister Sarath Amunugama and as such it was necessary for the Cabinet to re-review the agreement and delete the clauses which were not in the best interests of the country.

“President Maithripala Sirisena, the SLFP and the UPFA are of the view that the Hambantota Port agreement should be beneficial to the country and to the economy and must not compromise national security or the sovereignty. We have reservations on some of the clauses in the draft agreement and therefore we need to review the agreement and remove whatever was harmful,” the minister said yesterday.

He said neither the SLFP nor the President would agree to the 80% equity swap as proposed in the draft agreement

Minister Ranatunga in his letter has pointed out that the draft agreement gives the authority to a separate company to operate the Hambantota Port with the sole power to decide on port fees and carry out development work within a 50-kilometer radius of the port.

"The proposed private company will hold 80% equity of the Hambantota Port Development project with the Sri Lanka Ports Authority having the balance 20%. As such, the agreement between the China Merchants Ports Holdings Company and the SLPA cannot be signed without amending the previous Public Private Partnership (PPP) agreement and the SLPA Act," he said.

The minister has proposed that the SLAPA equity be increased to 35% and reduce the 99-year lease period and voiced his concern on the failure to include a clause relating to port security.

He has called for a review of the US$1.4 billion as agreed by the two partners as the cost of the Hambantota port pointing out that the Hambantota Port was worth much more. (Sandun A Jayasekera)

  Comments - 3

  • JAN Tuesday, 07 March 2017 05:56 PM

    Develop entire Hambanthota port with ship yards Dry docks Bunkering Hotels Hospitals with help of China for 60years lease via DM Android App

    Mason Tuesday, 07 March 2017 06:08 PM

    The government must have controlling interest and therefore the share should be minimum 51%. It is dangerous to lease for 99 years, which is virtually selling part of the Country, this must be brought down to 30 years.

    Shelly. Tuesday, 07 March 2017 07:44 PM

    Present back door SLFPers blaming UNP attempt to gether strength tretcherously to face oncoming LG election .China has already hinted about withdrawl. Revival of economy is not in there agenda. via DM Android App


Add comment

Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.

Reply To:

Name - Reply Comment




The 20th Amendment Bill Lest We Forget

Strident calls were repeatedly made from many quarters for the 19th Amendment

Public transport 'side-laned'?

“Miss, mantheeru neethiya nisa api bus passen yanna one. Ithin drop eka par

Land acquisitions in Hanthana and Knuckles Mountain ranges

Sri Lankans will soon lose their opportunity to boast about the rich biodiver

Wanathawilluwa forest clearance: Whodunit?

Days after the Anawilundawa Ramsar Wetland, situated in Puttalam District, ma